TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A


Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934


(Amendment No.)

Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

☐

Preliminary Proxy Statement
☐
☐
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
☒
Definitive Proxy Statement
☐

Definitive Additional Materials
☐

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12§240.14a-12

LANDS’

LANDS' END, INC.


(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)



(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

☒
No fee required.required
☐

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.materials
☐

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11

TABLE OF CONTENTS


LOGO

March 31, 2022

 

April 10, 2024
To our Stockholders:

I am pleased to invite you to attend the 20222024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Lands’ End, Inc. (the “Company” or “Lands’ End”) on Wednesday,Thursday, May 11, 2022.9, 2024. The meeting will begin at 2:9:00 p.m.a.m. (Central time)Time) at the Gary C. Comer Activity Center, 3 Lands’ End Lane, Dodgeville, Wisconsin 53595.

Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, please read the Proxy Statement and vote your shares. Instructions for Internetinternet and telephone voting are included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card (if you received your materials by mail).

An admission ticket (or other acceptable proof of stock ownership) and a form of government-issued photo identification (such as a valid driver’s license or passport) will be required for admission to the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders who own Lands’ End common stock as of the close of business on March 14, 202220, 2024, will be entitled to attend the Annual Meeting. An admission ticket will serve as verification of your ownership.

If your Lands’ End shares are held in a bank or brokerage account, you can attend the annual meeting if you bring your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or a recent bank or brokerage statement showing you owned shares of Lands’ End common stock on March 14, 2022.20, 2024. You may also contact your bank or broker to obtain a written legal proxy.

Registration will begin at 1:8:15 p.m.a.m. and seating will begin at 1:8:30 p.m.a.m. Use of cameras, recording devices, and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting.

​​
Sincerely,

Sincerely,

​​

 
​​
Andrew J. McLean

LOGO

Jerome Griffith

​

​

Chief Executive Officer

LANDS’ END, INC.   1 LANDS’ END LANE    DODGEVILLE, WISCONSIN 53595

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Lands’ End, Inc.


1 Lands’ End Lane


Dodgeville, Wisconsin 53595

Notice of 20222024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Date:

​

​
May 11, 2022

9, 2024
Time:

2:​

​
9:00 p.m.a.m. Central Time

Place:

​

​
Lands’ End, Inc.

​

​
Gary C. Comer Activity Center

​

​
3 Lands’ End Lane

​

​
Dodgeville, Wisconsin 53595

Please attend the 20222024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Lands’ End, Inc. (the “Company,” “Lands’ End,” “our company,” “we,” or “our,”) to:

1.
1.

Elect to Lands’ End’s Board of Directors the following eightsix nominees presented by the Board of Directors: Robert Galvin, Jerome Griffith, Elizabeth Leykum, Josephine Linden, John T. McClain, Maureen Mullen Murphy, Jignesh PatelAndrew J. McLean and Jonah Staw;

Alicia Parker;

2.
2.

Vote on a non-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers;

3.
3.Vote on a non-binding advisory resolution on the frequency of holding future stockholder votes regarding the compensation of our named executive officers;
4.

Ratify the appointment of BDO USA,Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022;2024; and

5.
4.

Consider any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.

The record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting is March 14, 2022.20, 2024. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on that date can vote at, or will be eligible to attend, the Annual Meeting.

On or about March 31, 2022April 10, 2024 we began mailing a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”)proxy materials to all stockholders of record as of March 14, 202220, 2024 and posted our proxy materials on the website referenced in the Notice (www.proxyvote.com). As more fully described in the Notice, stockholders may choose to access our proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice or may request a printed set of our proxy materials. In addition, the Notice and website provide information regarding how you may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis. For those who previously requested printed proxy materials or electronic materials on an ongoing basis, you will receive those materials as you requested.

www.proxyvote.com.

It is important that your shares are represented at the Annual Meeting. You may vote your shares
(1) in person at the Annual Meeting, (2) by telephone, (3) through the Internet, or (4) by completing and mailing a proxy card if you receive your proxy materials by mail. Specific instructions for voting by telephone or through the Internet (including voting deadlines) are included in the Notice and in the proxy card. If you attend and vote at the Annual Meeting, your vote at the Annual Meeting will replace any earlier vote.

By Order of the Board of Directors.

LOGO


Peter L. Gray

Executive Vice President,

Chief Commercial Officer, Chief Administrative

Officer,

General Counsel and Secretary
April 10, 2024

TABLE OF CONTENTS

March 31, 2022

PROXY STATEMENT

The accompanying proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Lands’ End, Inc. (the “Company,” “Lands’ End,” “our company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) Board of Directors (the “Board”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 11, 20229, 2024 (the “Annual Meeting”). On or about March 31, 2022,April 10, 2024, the Company began mailing to stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of the Proxy Materials containingproxy materials, including instructions on how to access proxy materials via the Internet and how to vote online (www.proxyvote.com). Stockholders who did not receive the Notice will continue to receive a paper or electronic copy of the proxy materials, which the Company also began sending on or about March 31, 2022.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials
for

the 20222024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

The Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20222024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January  28, 2022February 2, 2024 are available at www.proxyvote.com.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

​​
1

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

​​6
5

ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

​​7
6

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

​​17
16

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK

​​18
17

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

​​20
19

ITEM 2. ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

​​
44

ITEM 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF HOLDING FUTURE VOTES REGARDING THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
​​
45
ITEM 4. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

​​45
46

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS

​​47
49

OTHER INFORMATION

​​48
49
i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Q.

Why is Lands’ End distributing this Proxy Statement?

A.

Our Board of Directors is soliciting proxies for use at the Lands’ End, Inc. 20222024 Annual Meeting (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on Wednesday,Thursday, May 11, 2022,9, 2024, at 2:9:00 p.m.a.m. Central Time, at the Gary C. Comer Activity Center, 3 Lands’ End Lane, Dodgeville, Wisconsin 53595. In order to solicit your proxy, we must furnish you with this Proxy Statement, which contains information about the matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

Q.

What information is contained in these materials?

A.

The information included in this proxy statement relates to the proposals to be considered and voted on at the Annual Meeting, the voting process, the compensation of the directors and our most highly paid executive officers, and other required information. Our Form 10-K for fiscal year 20212023 is available to review with this proxy statement. We are mailing materials relating to the Notice of 20222024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and instructions on how to access the proxy statement (or, for those who request it, a hard copy of this proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy) to our stockholders on or about March 31, 2022.

April 10, 2024.

Q.

Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

A.

In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy materials to each stockholder, we are furnishing proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and the Annual Report on Form 10-K, by providing access to such documents on the Internet. Most stockholders will not receive printed copies of the proxy materials unless they request them. Instead, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) has been sent to most of our stockholders instructing them as to how to access and review the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice also provides instructions as to how you may submit your proxy on the Internet. If you would like to receive a paper or email copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions for requesting such materials in the Notice.

Q.

What will stockholders be asked to do at the Annual Meeting?

A.

At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders will be asked to:

Electelect to Lands’ End’s Board of Directors the following eightsix nominees presented by the Board of Directors: Robert Galvin, Jerome Griffith, Elizabeth Leykum, Josephine Linden, John T. McClain, Maureen Mullen Murphy, Jignesh PatelAndrew J. McLean and Jonah Staw;

Alicia Parker;

•

vote on a non-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (as identified under “Executive Compensation”);

vote on a non-binding advisory resolution on the frequency of holding future stockholder votes regarding the compensation of our named executive officers;

ratify the appointment of BDO USA,Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022;2024; and

consider any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting.

Q.

What does it mean to vote by proxy?

A.

It means that you give someone else the right to vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. In this way, you ensure that your vote will be counted even if you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting. If

you give your proxy but do not include specific instructions on how to vote, the individuals named as proxies will vote your shares as follows:

you give your proxy but do not include specific instructions on how to vote, the individuals named as proxies will vote your shares as follows:

FOR the election of eight nominees for director;

FOR the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement; and

FOR the ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022.

•
FOR the election of all six of the Board of Directors’ nominees for election to the Board of Directors;
•
FOR the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this Proxy Statement;
•
FOR the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of holding future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers every year; and
•
FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2024.
Q.

Who is entitled to vote?

A.

Only holders of our common stock at the close of business on March 14, 202220, 2024 (the “Record Date”) are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each outstanding share of common stock is entitled to one vote. There were 32,986,20431,491,974 shares of our common stock outstanding on the Record Date.

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Q.

How do I cast my vote?

A.

If you hold your shares directly in your own name, you are a “registered stockholder” and can complete and submit a proxy through the Internet, by telephone or by mail (if you received your proxy materials by mail) or vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a broker or other nominee, you are a “street-name stockholder” and will receive instructions from your broker or other nominee describing how to vote your shares.

Q.

How do I vote by telephone or through the Internet?

A.

If you are a registered stockholder, you may vote by telephone or through the Internet following the instructions in the Notice or in the proxy card. If you are a street-name stockholder, your broker or other nominee will provide information for you to use in directing your broker or nominee how to vote your shares.

Q.

Who will count the vote?

A.

A representative of Broadridge Financial Services, Inc., an independent tabulator, will count the vote and act as the inspector of election.

Q.

Can I change my vote after I have voted?

A.

A subsequent vote by any means will change your prior vote. For example, if you voted by telephone, a subsequent Internetinternet vote will change your vote. If you are a registered stockholder and wish to change your vote by mail, you may do so by requesting, in writing, a proxy card from the Secretary of the Company at Lands’ End, Inc., Legal Department, 1 Lands’ End Lane, Dodgeville, Wisconsin 53595, Attention: Secretary. The last vote timely received prior to the Annual Meeting will be the one counted. If you are a registered stockholder, you may also change your vote by voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Street- name stockholders wishing to change their votes must contact the broker or nominee directly (the holder of record). If you are a street-name stockholder, you are not the record holder of your shares, and while you are welcome to attend the Annual Meeting, you will not be permitted to vote unless you obtain a signed proxy from your bank, broker or other nominee.

Q.

Can I revoke a proxy?

A.

Yes, registered stockholders may revoke a properly executed proxy at any time before it is exercised by submitting a letter addressed to and received by the Secretary at the address listed in the answer to the

previous question, or by voting in person at the meeting. If you are a street-name stockholder, you must contact your broker or other nominee for instructions on how to revoke your voting instructions for your shares.

previous question, or by voting in person at the meeting. If you are a street-name stockholder, you must contact your broker or other nominee for instructions on how to revoke your voting instructions for your shares.

Q.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice, proxy or voting instruction card?

A.

It means your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. For all Notices you receive, please enter your vote by Internet for each control number you have been assigned. If you received paper copies of proxy materials, please complete, sign and mail all proxy and voting instruction cards you receive. We encourage you to register all your accounts in the same name and address. Registered stockholders may contact our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., at P.O. Box 505000, Louisville, Kentucky 40223 43006, Providence RI 02940-3006 (1-866-627-2096). Street-name stockholders holding shares through a broker or other nominee should contact their broker or nominee and request consolidation of their accounts.

Q.

What is a quorum?

A.

A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, being present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, constitutes a quorum. A quorum is necessary to conduct the Annual Meeting.

Q.

How many votes are needed to approve each of the proposals?

A.

Item 1: The director nominees will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and present in person or represented by proxy. This means that the eightsix nominees who receive the most affirmative votes will be elected as directors.

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2: Approval of the compensation of our named executive officers on a non-binding advisory basis requires the affirmative vote of a majority of those shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal.

Item 3: A plurality of the votes cast is required for the non-binding advisory approval of the frequency of stockholder votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. This means that the frequency option that receives the most affirmative votes of all the votes cast is the one that will be deemed approved by the stockholders.
Item 4: Ratification of the appointment of BDO USA,Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of those shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal.

Q.

What is the effect of an abstention?

A.

The shares of a stockholder who abstains from voting on a matter will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting so long as the stockholder is present in person or represented by proxy. With regard to the election of directors, votes may be cast in favor or withheld, and votes that are withheld will have no effect. On all other matters, abstentions may be specified. An abstention from voting on a matter by a stockholder present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting has no effect on the outcome of the vote on the frequency of stockholder votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. An abstention from voting on a matter by a stockholder present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting will havehas the same legal effect as a vote “against” theseall other proposals.

Q.

How will votes be counted on shares held through brokers?

A.

If you are a street-name stockholder and do not provide your broker with voting instructions, your shares may constitute “broker non-votes.” Generally, broker non-votes occur on a matter when a broker is not permitted to vote on that matter without instructions from the beneficial owner and instructions are not given. Brokers are not entitled to vote on the election of directors, or the advisory proposal to approve the compensation of our named executive officers or the frequency of stockholder votes on the compensation of our named executive officers, unless the brokers receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner. Broker non-votes will be treated as shares present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. In tabulating the voting result for any particular proposal, shares that constitute broker non-votes are not considered present and entitled to vote on that proposal. Brokers will be permitted to vote without voting instructions on the ratification of the

appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Thus, broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of any matter being voted on at the Annual Meeting, assuming that a quorum is obtained.

appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. Thus, broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of any matter being voted on at the Annual Meeting, assuming that a quorum is obtained.

Q.

Is cumulative voting permitted for the elections of directors?

A.

No, you may not cumulate your votes for the election of directors.

Q.

Who may attend the Annual Meeting?

A.

Any stockholder as of the Record Date may attend.

If you plan to attend the meeting, you will be required to present an Admission Ticket (or other acceptable proof of stock ownership) and a form of government-issued photo identification (such as a valid driver’s license or passport). We strongly urge you to obtain your Admission Ticket in advance by accessing www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions provided (you will need the 16 digit number included on your proxy card or voting instruction form or Notice)form).

Alternatively, the following documents will be accepted in lieu of an Admission Ticket for those stockholders as of the Record Date who are unable to obtain an Admission Ticket in advance of the Annual Meeting:

If you received a Notice and will not be requesting a printed copy of the proxy materials, you may use your Notice as your Admission Ticket.

If your Lands’ End shares are registered in your name and you received your proxy materials by mail, you may use the Admission Ticket attached to your proxy card at the Annual Meeting.

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If your Lands’ End shares are held in a bank or brokerage account, you can attend the annual meeting if you bring your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or a recent bank or brokerage statement showing you owned shares of Lands’ End common stock on March 14, 2022.20, 2024. You may also contact your bank or broker to obtain a written legal proxy.

Q.

Will the meeting be held in person or virtually?

A.

We intend to hold our Annual Meeting in person and will follow applicable public health guidance regarding safeguards, including social distancing. However, we are actively monitoring the COVID-19 situation.person. In the event it is not possible to hold our annual meeting in person, we will announce alternative arrangements for the meeting as promptly as practicable, which may include holding the meeting solely by means of remote communication which would allow stockholders to participate virtually. Please monitor our investor relations website at http://investors.landsend.com for updated information. If you are planning to attend our meeting, please check the website one week prior to the meeting date. We encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting.

Q.

Can I access future annual meeting materials through the Internet rather than receiving them by mail?

A.

Yes. Registered stockholders can sign up for electronic delivery at www.proxyvote.com. If you vote through the Internet, you can also sign up for electronic delivery. Just follow the instructions that appear after you finish voting. You will receive an e-mail next year containing links to our Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Proxy Statement for our 20232025 annual meeting. Street-name stockholders may also have the opportunity to receive copies of these documents electronically. Please check the information provided in the proxy materials mailed to you by your broker or other nominee regarding the availability of this service. This procedure reduces the printing costs and fees we incur in connection with the solicitation of proxies.

Q.

What is “householding”?

A.

Lands’ End has adopted a procedure called “householding,” which has been approved by the SEC. Under this procedure, registered stockholders who have the same address and last name and do not receive proxy materials electronically will receive a single Notice or set of proxy materials, unless one or more of these stockholders notifies us that they wish to continue receiving individual copies. Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. This procedure can result in savings to Lands’ End by reducing printing and postage costs.

If your household received a single Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders or, if applicable, a single set of proxy materials this year, but you would prefer to receive your own copy, please contact Broadridge Householding Department, by calling their toll-free number, 1-866-540-7095 or by writing to: Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. You will be removed from the householding program within 30 days of receipt of your instructions at which time you will then be sent separate copies of the documents.

Registered stockholders who share the same address, currently receive multiple copies of proxy materials, and wish to receive only one copy of these materials per household in the future may contact Broadridge Financial Solutions at the Householding Department address or telephone number listed above. Street-name stockholders should contact their broker or other nominee to request information about householding.
4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Practices

The Lands’ End Board of Directors is committed to effective corporate governance. The Board has approved and adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that provide the framework for Lands’ End’s governance. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board reviews and assesses the Corporate Governance Guidelines annually and recommends changes to the Board as appropriate. The Corporate Governance Guidelines, along with the charters of Board committees, our Director Compensation Policy, our Code of Conduct and our Board of Directors Code of Conduct are available on our website at www.landsend.com, under the heading “Investor Relations” and then “Corporate Governance.”

Among other things, the Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that:

Independent directors will meet regularly in executive session in conjunction with regularly scheduled Board meetings.

Executive sessions of the independent directors will occur at least twice a year as determined by the independent directors.

The Board and each of its committees has the power to engage, at the Company’s expense, independent legal, financial, and other advisors as deemed necessary, without consulting or obtaining the approval of the Company’s officers in advance.

The Board will conduct annual self-evaluations to assess whether it and its committees are functioning effectively.

Director Independence

Based on the review and recommendation by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board analyzed the independence of each director. In making its independence determinations, the Board considers transactions, relationships and arrangements, if any, between Lands’ End and entities with which directors are associated as executive officers, directors and trustees. When these transactions, relationships and arrangements exist, they are in the ordinary course of business and are of a type customary for a company like Lands’ End.

As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that the following directorsdirector nominees meet the standards of independence under the applicable Nasdaq Stock Market listing rules, including that each member is free of any relationship that would interfere with his or hertheir individual exercise of independent judgment:

Robert Galvin


Elizabeth Leykum


Josephine Linden


John T. McClain

Maureen Mullen Murphy

Jignesh Patel

Jonah Staw


Alicia Parker
The Board also has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets additional, heightened independence criteria applicable to audit committee members under the Nasdaq Stock Market listing rules and SEC Rule 10A-3, and each of Robert Galvin, Josephine Linden, and John T. McClain is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC.

The Board also has determined that all members of the Compensation Committee and of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meet independence criteria applicable to such committee members under the Nasdaq Stock Market listing rules.
5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Item 1 is the election of eightsix nominees to our Board: Robert Galvin, Jerome Griffith, Elizabeth Leykum, Josephine Linden, John T. McClain, Maureen Mullen Murphy, Jignesh PatelAndrew J. McLean and Jonah Staw. EachAlicia Parker. Alicia Parker is being nominated for the first time, and each of the other nominees is a current member of the Board. If elected, each nominee will hold office until the next annual meeting or until his or hertheir successor is elected and qualified, or earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal. The Board currently has seven members: Robert Galvin, Elizabeth Leykum, Josephine Linden, John T. McClain, Andrew J. McLean, who are standing for reelection, as well as Jignesh Patel and Jonah Staw, who are not standing for reelection. By resolution of the Board in accordance with the Company’s Bylaws, effective upon the 2024 Annual Meeting, the size of the Board will be reduced to six members. We wish to thank Jignesh Patel and Jonah Staw, who have each served on the Board since 2014, for their many years of distinguished service on the Board and their dedication to the Company.
The persons named in the proxy card (the “proxies”) will vote FOR the election of all of the nominees listed below, unless otherwise instructed. You may not vote for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named in this Proxy Statement. The Board expects all nominees to be available for election. If any nominee should become unavailable to serve as a director for any reason prior to the Annual Meeting, the Board may substitute another person as a nominee. In that case, your shares will be voted for that other person.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE


“FOR” ELECTION OF THE EIGHTSIX NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR

The biographies of each of the nominees and members of the Board below contains information regarding the person’s service as a director, business experience, education, public company director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, information regarding involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Board to determine that the person should serve as a director for the Company.

New Nominee:
Alicia Parker, 47, has been nominated for election to the Board for the first time at the Annual Meeting. Since 2021 she has served as Chief Marketing Officer of Tishman Speyer, a leading international real estate owner, developer, operator and investment manager. Previously she served as Vice President, Brand & Consumer Marketing of Casper Sleep from 2020 to 2021, and as Director of Sales and Marketing of the Peninsula Hotels from 2017 to 2020. Prior to that she served as Senior Director, Marketing from 2013 to 2017, and Global Brand & Program Director from 2012 to 2013, for Ralph Lauren. She also served as Senior Vice President, Marketing and Business Strategy of Agenda from 2011 to 2012, and as Group Account Director of RDA from 2007 to 2011. She also worked in public relations from 2006 to 2007 at Warner Bros. Records and served as a Brand Marketing Consultant and Producer from 2004-2006. She served as Manager, Global Partner Network from 2001 to 2004, and Associate/Associate Manager from 1998 to 2000 for Strategic Management Group, Inc. Ms. Parker brings to the Board an extensive and dynamic understanding of marketing, brand development and sales, from both her in-house and agency experience in a variety of industries.
Nominees Currently Serving on the Board:
Robert Galvin, 62,64, joined the Board in May 2014. Since October 2018, he has served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of the board of directors ofIconix International, formerly Iconix Brand Group, Inc., a leading brand management company.company, which Mr. Galvin also served as a member of the board of directors from October 2018 to August 2021. From January 2014 to October 2018, he was the principal of Galvin Consulting, which he founded in January 2014. Mr. Galvin served as the Chief Executive Officer of Elie Tahari, a leading global designer lifestyle brand, from January to November 2013. Prior to that, he served as the President of Camuto Group, a leading global women’s fashion footwear company from April 2007 to January 2012. Mr. Galvin previously served as the Chief Operating Officer of Sport Brands International, a global wholesale and retail athletic branded company from 2003 until April 2007. He previously held leadership roles at Kurt Salmon Associates, York International and Nine West Group Inc. Mr. Galvin served as a member of the board of directors of Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation from July 2015 to October 2018, bebe stores, inc. from November 2014 to September 2018, Cherokee Inc. (now Apex Global Brands Inc.) from June 2012 to October 2018 and Trans World Entertainment Corporation from June 2018 to October 2018. Mr. Galvin has a B.S. in Accounting from
6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fairfield University and a M.B.A. from New York University, Stern School of Business. Mr. Galvin brings an extensive knowledge of the apparel industry and management experience, gained through his service as Chief Executive Officer and through numerous senior executive positions at several apparel companies for more than 15 years.

Jerome Griffith, 64, has served as Chief Executive Officer of Lands’ End and as a member of the Board since March 2017. In addition, between March 2017 and March 2021 he was also President. He served as the Chief Executive Officer, President and a member of the board of directors of Tumi Holdings, Inc., a global lifestyle brand, from April 2009 until its sale in August 2016 to Samsonite International S.A. From 2002 to 2009, he was employed at Esprit Holdings Limited, a global fashion brand, where he was promoted to Chief Operating Officer and appointed to the board in 2004, then promoted to President of Esprit North and South America in 2006. From 1999 to 2002, he worked as an Executive Vice President at Tommy Hilfiger. From 1998 to 1999, he worked as the President of Retail at the J. Peterman Company, a catalog-based apparel and retail company. From 1989 through 1998, he worked in various positions of increasing responsibility at Gap, Inc. Previously, he served as a member of the board of Parsons School of Design, which is part of the New School, from 2013 to 2020, and as a member of the Supervisory Board of the Tom Tailor Group from May 2015 to March 2017. He has served as a member of the board of Vince Holding Corp. since November 2013 and Samsonite International S.A. since August 2016. He holds a B.S. degree in marketing from The Pennsylvania State University. Mr. Griffith brings to the Board experience as a public company director, experience as a senior executive of a major global consumer products company and a proven track record of innovation and driving international growth and expansion.

Elizabeth Leykum, 43,45, joined the Board in March 2014. She has served as founder of Serenade Capital LLC, an investment firm, since May 2016. From October 2013 to April 2016, she served as a founding principal of HEG Capital LLC, a Connecticut-registered investment advisory firm. Prior to joining HEG Capital,

Ms. Leykum was, from June 2012 to September 2013, a Vice President at Rand Group, an investment management services firm. From July 2004 until June 2012, she was a Vice President of ESL Investments, Inc. From 2000 to 2002, Ms. Leykum worked in the Principal Investment Area at Goldman, Sachs & Co. Since April 2021, she has served as a member of the board for IES Holdings, Inc. and since May 2021 she has served as a member and Chair of the board of Valaris Ltd. She is currently a trustee of The Kinkaid School and the Houston Ballet, as well as on the Advisory Board of The Artemis Fund. She graduated Phi Beta Kappa, magna cum laude from Harvard College and received an M.B.A with distinction from Harvard Business School. Through her work in investment management, she brings to the Board a strong ability to analyze, assess, and oversee corporate and financial performance.

Josephine Linden, 70,72, joined the Board in March 2014 and has served as Chair of the Board since October 2014. She founded and has been the managing member and principal of Linden Global Strategies LLC, a New York-based SEC registered investment management firm working with sophisticated U.S. and international clients, since September 2011. From September 2010 to July 2011, she held an Adjunct Professor position in the Finance department of Columbia Business School. In November 2008, Mrs. Linden retired from Goldman, Sachs & Co. as a Partner and Managing Director after having been with the firm for more than 25 years, where she held a variety of roles, including Managing Director and Regional Manager of the New York office for Private Wealth Management, head of Global Equities Compliance, and an Advisor to GSJBWere, Australia. She currently serves as a trustee, and sits on the executive committee,Investment Committee of the Collegiate School in New York, New York, and also haswhere she previously served as its Treasurer and as a trustee, sat on the executive committee, and served as Chair of its Finance, Audit and Nominating Committees. She actspreviously acted as Financial Advisor to The Prince of Wales Foundation. She previously served as a director of Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores, Inc. from October 2012 to October 2019 and as a director of Trine Acquisition Corp. from May 2019 to December 2020. Mrs. Linden has also served as a non-executive director of E&P Financial Group Limited (formerly Evans Dixon Limited) since May 2018, and as a director of Trine II Acquisition Corp. sincefrom November 2021.2021 to April 2023. She received an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago, with a specialization in Finance, and a B.A. from the University of Sydney. In September 2022, Mrs. Linden was appointed an Honorary Member in the General Division of the Order of Australia for her significant service to the Australia-United States bilateral relationship, the international finance sector, and the professional development of Australia. Mrs. Linden brings extensive knowledge of capital markets and other financial matters to the Board from her 25-year career with Goldman Sachs.

John T. McClain, 61,63, joined the Board in May 2014. Since February 2019, he has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Iconix International, formerly Iconix Brand Group, Inc., a leading brand management company. From November 2015 to September 2016, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Lindblad Expeditions Holdings, Inc., a global provider of expedition cruises and adventure travel experiences. Mr. McClain served as the Chief Financial Officer of The Jones Group Inc., a leading global designer, marketer and wholesaler of over 25 brands, from July 2007 until the sale of the company to Sycamore Partners in April 2014. From April 2014 to August 2014, he continued to provide Senior Advisor services related to financial operations to The Jones Group Inc. Prior to that, Mr. McClain held a number of roles at Avis Budget Group, Inc., formerly Cendant Corporation. He joined Cendant Corporation in September 1999, serving as the Senior Vice President, Finance & Corporate Controller until 2006. From 2006 to 2007, Mr. McClain served as the Chief Accounting Officer of Avis and Chief Operating Officer of Cendant Finance Holdings. Mr. McClain previously held leadership roles at Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. and ITT Corporation. Mr. McClain has served as a trustee of Seritage Growth Properties, a real estate investment trust, since June 2015. He previously served on the board of Nine West Holdings from April 2014 until October 2015, and on the board of Cherokee Inc. (now Apex Global Brands Inc.) from September 2017 to January 2019. Mr. McClain holds a B.S degree in accounting from Lehigh University. Mr. McClain brings over 25 years of executive financial experience, serving at high-level capacities for the retail and consumer sectors.
7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Maureen Mullen Murphy

Andrew J. McLean, 41, joined the Board in June 2018. Mrs. Murphy has served NIKE, Inc. as Vice President of Nike Direct Digital Commerce Flagship and Activity since April 2020. She previously served as

Chief Strategy Officer of the Gartner for Marketing division of Gartner, Inc., a leading research and advisory company, from March 2017 to March 2020. From June 2009 to March 2017 she served as Chief Strategy Officer of L2, Inc., a market research firm she co-founded, which was acquired by Gartner, Inc. in March 2017. Mrs. Murphy holds a B.A. degree in Human Biology from Stanford University, and received an M.B.A. in Strategy and Finance from New York University, Stern School of Business. Mrs. Murphy brings extensive experience assessing eCommerce strategies, advising on strategic, tactical and organizational investments regarding companies operating in the digital age, and serving as a thought leader on digital matters.

Jignesh Patel, 51, joined the Board in April 2014. He is a professor in the Computer Science Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where he has served on the faculty since September 2008. He is also the co-founder of a startup, DataChat, that was founded in 2017. He served as the Chief Scientist of Pivotal Software, Inc. from June 2015 to June 2016. He co-founded Locomatix, which developed a platform to power mobile data-driven services and applications, and served as its Chief Executive Officer from June 2010 to August 2013, when the company became part of Twitter. He is currently the sole proprietor of JMP Consulting LLC, which provides consulting services on data-related technologies and is a Fellow of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Fellow. Mr. Patel obtained his B. Tech. (with honors) in Computer Science and Engineering from IT-BHU (now IIT-Varanasi) in 1991, M.S. in Computer Sciences from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1993, and Ph. D. in Computer Sciences from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1998. Mr. Patel brings extensive experience with emerging technologies and technology-driven companies from his academic and professional activities.

Jonah Staw, 46, joined the Board in April 2014. Mr. Staw55, has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Staw Entertainment Enterprises, LLC, an advisory group working with corporate clients, since August 2011. He also has served as Vice President of Logitech Inc., a global provider of personal computer and mobile accessories, since January 2017. Mr. Staw is the co-founder of LittleMissMatched, a multi-channel international brand that includes retail, wholesale, licensing, catalog and internet businesses, and served2023. He joined Lands’ End as its Chief Executive Officer from 2004 to July 2011Officer-Designate and as Chairman from July 2011 to July 2012. Mr. Staw previously served as a director and strategist at Frog Design, a product strategy and design firm, from 1999 to 2004 and as a member of the real estate development teamBoard of Skanska USADirectors in November 2022. Prior to joining the Company, he served at American Eagle Outfitters, Inc., the parent of the American Eagle and Aerie brands, from 1997October 2016 to 1999. Mr. Staw graduated Phi Beta Kappa and magna cum laude from Brown University with a B.A.September 2022, in the Historyroles of ArtPresident, International from August 2022 to September 2022, Executive Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer from April 2017 to August 2022, and Architecture.Executive Vice President, International from October 2016 to April 2017. Mr. StawMcLean served Urban Outfitters, Inc. as Chief Operating Officer and Head of International from 2014 to October 2016, and as Chief Operating Officer from 2008 to 2014. Mr. McLean held various positions at Liz Claiborne, Inc., including President, Outlet Division, from 2003 to 2008, as well as, various positions at Gap, Inc. from 2000 to 2003. Mr. McLean began his career as a strategy consultant with AT Kearney. Outside of his professional commitments, Mr. McLean is an active member of the Duke University parents committee, where he acts as a parent ambassador and student mentor. Mr. McLean received his Bachelor’s degree in Engineering from the University of Manchester, a Master’s degree in Engineering Management from the University of Cambridge and an MBA from Harvard Business School. Mr. McLean brings to the Board extensive knowledgeoperational and strategic expertise and over 20 years of multi-channel retail businesses including digital, branding, product development,experience leading organizational growth for several Fortune 500 and start-up companies. Mr. McLean has a proven track record in the areas of global brand delivery and international strategy, marketing and innovation through his professionalcustomer experience.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board is responsible for reviewing the qualifications and independence of members of the Board and its various committees on a periodic basis, as well as the composition of the Board as a whole. This assessment includes members’ qualification as independent, as well as consideration of skills and experience in relation to the needs of the Board. New director nominees will beare recommended to the Board by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The ultimate responsibility for selection of director nominees resides with the Board.
8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Inclusion and Diversity

The Board believes that diversity promotes innovation and is integral to honoring Lands’ End’s commitment to “Take care of the customer, take care of the employee and the rest will take care of itself.” We are deeply committed to hiring and promoting inclusively, championing pay equity, increasing diverse representation at all levels of Lands’ End, and fostering an inclusive culture where our employees can develop and grow professionally, and contribute to our collective success. We believe the Board exhibits the diversity we foster within our employees.

While the Company does not have a formal Board diversity policy, the Board considers diversity, including diversity of racial, ethnic, gender and socio-economic background, in identifying director nominees. The Board and the Nominating and Governance Committee believe that it is important that our directors represent diverse

viewpoints. In addition to diversity of experience, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks director candidates with a broad diversity of professions, skills and backgrounds. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee discusses Board composition, including the diversity of the Board, annually. Of the current eightseven members of the Board, (who are also our proposed Board nominees), threetwo directors are female and one director is of South Asian descent.descent and, of our six nominees, three are female. The table below sets forth diversity information regarding our Board of Directors:

Board Diversity Matrix (as of March 31, 2022)

 

        

Total Number of Directors

   8 
   Female   Male   Non-Binary   Did Not
Disclose
Gender		 

Part I: Gender Identity

        

Directors

   3    5     

Part II: Demographic Background

        

African American or Black

        

Alaskan Native or Native American

        

Asian

     1     

Hispanic or Latinx

        

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

        

White

   3    4     

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

        

LGBTQ+

        

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

        

Board Diversity Matrix (as of April 10, 2024)*
Total Number of Directors
​​
7
 
​​
Female
​​
Male
​​
Non-
Binary
​​
Did Not
Disclose
Gender
Part I: Gender Identity
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
Directors
​​
2
​​
5
​​
 
​​
 
Part II: Demographic Background
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
African American or Black
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
Alaskan Native or Native American
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
Asian
​​
 
​​
1
​​
 
​​
 
Hispanic or Latinx
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
White
​​
2
​​
4
​​
 
​​
 
Two or More Races or Ethnicities
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
LGBTQ+
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
Did Not Disclose Demographic Background
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
*
For our Board Diversity Matrix as of May 2, 2023, please see our proxy statement filed with the SEC on May 2, 2023.
Corporate Citizenship—Commitment to ESG Matters

ESG Oversight

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors oversees Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) through reviewing with management the Company’s ESG strategies, initiatives and policies. In addition, the Board and its committees review and discuss with management matters related to human capital management, including Lands’ End’s commitments and progress on inclusion and diversity, employee engagement, compensation and benefits, business conduct and compliance, and executive succession planning. During fiscal year 2021, the Board and its committees also reviewed and discussed with management the impact of COVID-19 on Lands’ End’s employees, supply chain and business, and management’s strategies and initiatives to respond to, and mitigate, adverse impacts, including enhanced health and safety measures for Lands’ End’s workforce.

Sustainability Initiatives

The Board believes that good stewardship of the environment is fundamental to Lands’ End’s long-term success, and Lands’ End is working towards improving its sustainable footprint through key practices like waste reduction, purchasing recycled consumables and through corporate relationships. Lands’ End hopes to inspire customers and other corporations to increase sustainability awareness and initiatives.

We have a focus on raising awareness and educating employees on reducing our internal use of consumables and natural resources. In addition, we have a broad range of recycling and waste management initiatives at our
9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

corporate office and distribution centers. For example, we are addressinghave implemented practices to reduce our use of office paper products and plastics, recycle aluminum cans and glass electronics and plasticwork with partners to reuse electronic equipment before recycling, as well as disposal of non-recyclables with an on-campus composting site. We also focus on efficient water and effective water management.energy management programs. Additional information and periodic updates regarding our sustainability policies and procedures can be found on our website at https://www.landsend.com/about-us/our-mission/sustainability/.

Sustainability Goals and Relationships

We have set in place and published the following sustainability priorities and goals regarding our products:

Timing
​​
Priorities
​​
Goals
TimingPrioritiesGoals
Accomplished and Ongoing
​​
Traceable Down
​​
100% of products usingdown used is Responsible Sourced Down
 Standard (RDS) certified down
​​
​​
Accomplished and Ongoing
​​
Water Conservation
​​
30% of products madegarments with fabric finishes use water-saving finishing processes
techniques
​By 2023​
​​Circularity
Accomplished and Ongoing
​​
Circularity
​​
Create a product life cycle component – from design to recycle
​​
​​
By 2025
​​
Sustainable Cotton
​​
100% of cotton from a sustainable source
​​
​​
By 2025
​​
Recycled Polyester
​​
100% of polyester fibers from a recycled source
​​
​​
By 2025
​​
Packaging and Labeling
​​
100% sustainable packaging and labeling

Lands’ End and its subsidiaries and affiliates are committed to having a positive role in promoting the sustainability of forests and other natural resources. Our objective is to encourage a sustainable combination of resources and processes to produce the paper for catalogs, internal use, and direct mail.

Lands’ End also participates in industry educational workshops and initiatives. We have formed strategic relationships with organizations like the Sustainable Apparel Coalition, National Forest Foundation, wherethrough which we have helped plant over 1funded the planting of nearly 1.4 million trees, and the Clean Lakes Alliance, where we help protect and improve maintenance of local lakes in Wisconsin. These alliances, which respectively operate globally, nationally, and locally, allow us to engage at a variety of levels.

Human Capital

Since our founding in 1963, Lands’ End has recognized that our people are a critical asset. People, the individuals we employ, the customers we serve, and their families, are the heart of our company. We are committed to creating an inspiring culture that is welcoming, safe and inclusive for all who work and shop with us.

Aligning with our overall message of comfort, our desire is to create “A More Comfortable World” with initiatives focused on our employees, our customers and our planet. Perhaps most telling, at Lands’ End the human resources department has been named “Employee Services” since its early days. This reinforces the message of our Our founder, Gary Comer set the foundation with this quote: “The really important thing that makes Lands’ End what it has become is people. You, me, everyone around us. It is what we do as people that makes this a great place to come to work”.

work.”

We employ approximately 5,0004,900 employees: approximately 4,0004,400 employees in the United States and approximately 1,000500 employees outside the United States. ThisThe U.S. workforce consists of approximately 20% salaried50% part-time employees, 40%32% hourly employees and 40% part-time18% salaried employees. With the seasonal nature of the fourth quarter holiday shopping season in the retail industry, approximately 1,500 additional, seasonal,flexible, part-time employees are hired in the U.S. to support our callcustomer service and distribution centers.

For an additional discussion about Human Capital, please see Part I, Item 1. Business “Human Capital Management” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2022.February 2, 2024.
10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Global Compliance Program

Lands’ End is committed to conducting business with a high standard of business ethics, a regard for human rights and in compliance with all applicable laws. Moreover, Lands’ End expects its product vendors to maintain similar

standards in its entire supply chain, including but not limited to raw materials, fabric and trim suppliers, employee recruitment services as well as any secondary processing facilities whether owned, leased or contracted. Lands’ End maintains a robust compliance program and holds its vendors to high ethical standards. Lands’ End has a long-standing Code of Conduct for its supply chain partners which prohibits the use of forced labor, modern slavery or human trafficking within our supply chain anywhere in the world. Lands’ End, in response to crisis in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, removed suppliers who could not demonstrate compliance with its policies, and requires that for any fabric produced in China all cotton used be 100% sourced outside of China from certified sources. Additionally, Lands’ End has shifted a sizeable amount of its production from China to other regions, such as Southeast Asia and the Indian sub-continent. The Global Compliance Program Requirements and the related processes, policies and procedures set forth certain basic and fundamental requirements that all domestic and international vendors must satisfy as a condition of doing business with Lands’ End. The requirements are developed based on local and national laws, International Labour Organization (ILO) conventions and benchmarked against industry protocols.

Lands’ End utilizes an independent auditor to conduct factory inspections to ensure compliance with its Code of Conduct and its Global Compliance Program. Lands’ End maintains an Ethics Hotline for reporting of suspected violations of its Code of Conduct and its policies by vendors, employees or customers. It also requires posters to be placed in all factories with reporting information for suspected violations.

Attendance

The Board met 106 times during fiscal year 2021.2023. All of the directors attended over 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and meetings of the committees on which they served. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors are expected to attend the Annual Meetings of Stockholders, and typically all directors are in attendance.
11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Committees of the Board

The Board has standing Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees. The table below reflects the current membership of each committee and the number of meetings held by each committee during fiscal year 2021.

     Audit    Nominating and
Corporate
Governance		    Compensation   

 

Josephine Linden*

 

    LOGO    LOGO    LOGO  

 

Robert Galvin

 

    LOGO        LOGO    

 

Jerome Griffith

 

              

 

Elizabeth Leykum

 

         LOGO       LOGO  

 

John T. McClain

 

    LOGO            

 

Maureen Mullen

 

              

 

Jignesh Patel

 

    LOGO    LOGO      

 

Jonah Staw

 

        LOGO      
    

 

    

 

    

 

  

 

Number of Meetings

    5    3    5  

2023.
 
​​
Audit
​​
Nominating
and
Corporate
Governance
​​
Compensation
Josephine Linden*
​​

 
​​

 
​​

 
Robert Galvin
​​

 
​​
 
​​

 
Elizabeth Leykum
​​
 
​​

 
​​

 
Andrew J. McLean
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
John T. McClain
​​

 
​​
 
​​
 
Jignesh Patel
​​

 
​​

 
​​
 
Jonah Staw
​​
 
​​

 
​​
 
Number of Meetings
​​
6
​​
5
​​
4
LOGO

 

​

​
Member


​​
Committee Chair
LOGO

Committee Chair

*

Chair of the Board

Each committee operates under a written charter. The charters are available at the “Corporate Governance” page in the “Investor Relations” section of www.landsend.comunder the heading “Corporate Governance Documents.” The principal functions of each Committee are summarized below.

Audit Committee

Responsible for the compensation and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with the annual audit report

Hires the independent registered public accounting firm to perform the annual audit

Reviews the Company’s annual and quarterly financial statements, including disclosures made in management’s discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition

Reviews the reports prepared by the independent registered public accounting firm and management’s responses thereto,

and discusses significant findings of the audit

Pre-approves audit and permitted non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm

Responsible for oversight of risks and exposures associated with financial matters, the Company’s enterprise risk management framework, including data protection and cybersecurity risk, and the steps management has taken to monitor and control risks and exposures

Reviews management’s plan for establishing and maintaining internal controls

Reviews the internal audit department’s responsibilities, budget and staffing

12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Discusses with the Company’s General Counsel matters that involve the Company’s compliance and ethics policies

Reviews and approves all related party transactions.

Compensation Committee

Evaluates the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of corporate goals and objectives

Reviews and approves the base salaries, annual incentive opportunities and cash- and equity-based awards and opportunities for our senior executives reporting to the CEO and equity awards for other Section 16 officers

Reviews and approves employment agreements, severance arrangements, change-in-control agreements and change-in-control provisions affecting any elements of compensation and benefits for our senior executives

Approves compensation plans and programs for our senior executives

Approves any special or supplemental compensation and benefits for senior executives, including supplemental retirement benefits and the perquisites provided to them during and after employment

Receives periodic reports on our compensation programs as they affect all employees.

employees

Develop policies for the recovery or clawback of compensation; monitor compliance and determine the manner of recovery pursuant to such policies.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Reports annually to the Board with an assessment of the performance of the Board

Recommends to the Board new director nominees

In concert with the Compensation Committee, reviews annually succession planning recommendations for the Company’s senior executives

Recommends to the Board director compensation and benefits

Reviews and reassesses the adequacy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines

Oversees Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) through reviewing with management the Company’s ESG strategies, initiatives and policies.

Communications with the Board

Our Board has adopted a policy and process for stockholders to communicate with the Board or an individual director. Stockholders may communicate with the Board collectively, or with any of its individual non-employee directors, by writing to Lands’ End, Inc. Board of Directors, c/o Secretary, Lands’ End, Inc., Legal Department, 1 Lands’ End Lane, Dodgeville, Wisconsin 53595. The Secretary has discretion to determine whether stockholder communications are proper for submission to the intended recipient. Examples of stockholder communications that would be considered presumptively inappropriate for submission include the following: communications regarding personal solicitations; spam and other junk mail; new product suggestions; resumes and other job inquiries; business solicitations or advertisements; communications that are unduly hostile, threatening, illegal, or similarly unsuitable; and communications that are frivolous in nature.

Board Leadership Structure

We currently separate the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board. Our Chief Executive Officer is responsible for the day-to-day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Chair of the Board provides guidance to our Chief Executive Officer and senior management and sets the agenda for and presides over our Board meetings. In carrying out her responsibilities, the Chair preserves the distinction between management and oversight, maintaining the responsibility of management to develop corporate strategy and the responsibility of the Board to review and express its views on corporate strategy and management’s execution of that strategy.
13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Consistent with our leadership structure, our Chief Executive Officer and other members of senior management are responsible for the identification, assessment, and management of risks that could affect the Company and the Board provides oversight in connection with these efforts. We do not believe that the Board’s role in risk oversight has an effect on the Company’s leadership structure. The Board’s oversight is conducted primarily through committees of the Board, as disclosed in the descriptions of the responsibilities of the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee above and in the charters of such committees.

The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of (1) risks and exposures associated with financial matters, particularly financial reporting, tax, accounting, disclosure, internal control over financial reporting, and credit and liquidity matters; (2) the Company’s enterprise risk management framework;framework, including data protection and cybersecurity risk; and (3) the steps management has taken to monitor and control risks and exposures, including the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies and strategies and programs and policies relating to legal compliance.

The Compensation Committee evaluates whether the risks arising from the Company’s compensation policies and practices for its employees would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company and has received management’s determination that our programs do not create risk that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Board has retained responsibility for general oversight of risks. The Board satisfies this responsibility through full reports by each committee chair regarding the committee’s considerations and actions, as well as through regular reports directly from officers responsible for oversight of particular risks within the Company, including our President and Chief Financial Officer, our General Counsel, our Chief InformationTechnology Officer and our most senior internal audit and information security professionals.

Nomination of Director Candidates

Directors may be nominated by the Board or by stockholders in accordance with our Bylaws. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will, when it deems appropriate, actively seek individuals qualified to become Board members, and will solicit input on director candidates from a variety of sources, including current directors. The Committee will evaluate a candidate’s qualifications and review all proposed nominees for the Board, including those proposed by stockholders, in accordance with its charter and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. This will include a review of the person’s qualifications and independence as well as consideration of diversity, age, skills, education and experience in the context of the needs of the Board. The Committee has the ability to retain a third party to assist in the nomination process.

Director nominees recommended by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are expected to be committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders. The Committee believes that it is important to align the interests of directors with those of our stockholders. Generally, each non-employee director is required to acquire a number of shares of our common stock in an amount that, at cost, is equal to the amount of the director’s annual retainer in effect on the date when the director first becomes a member of the

Board. Non-employee directors must meet this requirement by the third anniversary of that date unless, due to employment or legal restrictions, he or she is unable to acquire our common stock. As of January 28, 2022,February 2, 2024, all non-employee directors were in compliance with this requirement. Board members should possess a high degree of integrity and have broad knowledge, experience and mature judgment. In addition to a meaningful economic commitment to our company as expressed in share ownership, directors and nominees should have predominately business backgrounds, have experience at policy-making levels in business and/or technology, and bring a diverse set of business and life experiences and perspectives to the Board.

Mr. Griffith’sMcLean’s employment letter with the Company providedprovides for his appointment to the Board and provides that while he is Chief Executive Officer, he will be nominated for reelection to the Board each time his term as director is scheduled to expire. In addition, under his executive severance agreement with the Company, a termination of employment by Mr. GriffithMcLean is for “Good Reason” if, among other events, at any time that ESL Investments, Inc. and its affiliate entities beneficially own more than 20% of the Company’s shares entitled to vote for directors, they, in whole or in part, vote against his reelection to the Board while Mr. GriffithMcLean is serving as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.
14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A Lands’ End stockholder can nominate a candidate for election to the Board by complying with the nomination procedures in our Bylaws, which provide that for an election to be held at an annual meeting of stockholders, nomination by a stockholder must be made by notice in writing delivered to the Company not later than the 90th90th day, and not earlier than the 120th120th day, prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. If the date of the subject annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 70 days after the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, notice by the stockholder must be delivered not earlier than the 120th120th day prior to the annual meeting and not later than the later of the 90th90th day prior to the annual meeting or the 10th10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first made by the Company. For an election to be held at a special meeting of stockholders, the stockholder’s notice in writing must be delivered to the Company not earlier than the 120th120th day prior to the special meeting and not later than the later of the 90th90th day prior to the special meeting or the 10th10th day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of the special meeting and of the nominees proposed by the Board to be elected at the special meeting.

A stockholder’s written notice to the Secretary described in the preceding paragraph must be delivered to Lands’ End, Inc., Attn: Secretary, 1 Lands’ End Lane, Dodgeville, Wisconsin 53595. Any stockholder of record or beneficial owner of common stock proposing such a nomination must be a stockholder of record on the date of the giving of such notice and on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting of stockholders and comply with the applicable notice procedures set forth in the Company’s Bylaws, including setting forth the following in the written notice: (i) the name and address of the stockholder; (ii) the number of shares of capital stock of the Company owned beneficially and of record by the stockholder; (iii) a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding with respect to the nomination between or among the stockholder, any of its affiliates or associates, each nominee and any others acting in concert with any of the foregoing; (iv) a description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding that has been entered into as of the date of the stockholder’s notice by, or on behalf of, the stockholder, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of, the stockholder with respect to securities of the Company; (v) a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of stock of the Company entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to propose each nomination; (vi) a representation whether the stockholder intends or is part of a group that intends (a) to deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the Company’s outstanding capital stock required to elect each nominee and/or (b) otherwise to solicit proxies or votes from stockholders in support of each nomination; (vii) the name, age and business address of each nominee proposed in the notice; (viii) all information concerning the stockholder and each nominee required to be disclosed in proxy solicitations for director elections under the proxy rules of the SEC; and (ix) the written consent of each nominee to serve as a director if so elected.

The Company may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as the Company may reasonably require to determine the eligibility of the nominee to serve as a director. The chair of any annual meeting or special meeting of stockholders may refuse to acknowledge the nomination of any person not made in compliance with the foregoing procedures. In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under the Company’s Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules, (once effective), stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than Lands’ End’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than March 10, 2023.2025. Any decision to include information regarding a proposed nominee in the Company’s proxy solicitation materials will be made in accordance with the Company’s Bylaws and applicable law.

15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

Our Director Compensation Policy provides for an annual cash retainer for serving as a non-employee director of the Company, for serving as Board Chair, and for serving as the chair or member of committees as follows:

   Cash
Compensation(1)		 

Board Member

  $100,000 

Board Chair

  $30,000 

Audit Committee Chair

  $20,000 

Audit Committee Member (Non-Chair)

  $12,500 

Compensation Committee Chair

  $15,000 

Compensation Committee Member (Non-Chair)

  $10,000 

All Other Committee Chairs

  $10,000 

All Other Committee Members (Non-Chairs)

  $7,500 

​​
Cash
Compensation(1)
Board Member
​​
$100,000
Board Chair
​​
$30,000
Audit Committee Chair
​​
$20,000
Audit Committee Member (Non-Chair)
​​
$12,500
Compensation Committee Chair
​​
$15,000
Compensation Committee Member (Non-Chair)
​​
$10,000
All Other Committee Chairs
​​
$10,000
All Other Committee Members (Non-Chairs)
​​
$7,500
(1)

Assumes service for a full fiscal year; directors who serve for less than the full fiscal year are entitled to receive a pro-rated portion of the applicable payment.

In addition, the Director Compensation Policy provides that our non-employee directors may elect annually to receive all or a portion of their retainer in the form of shares of Lands’ End common stock. Non-employee directors also receive an annual Lands’ End gift card in the amount of $10,000, as well as a discount on the purchase of Lands’ End merchandise under a program available to all Lands’ End employees. Upon the approval on a case-by-case basis of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, a non-employee director may participate in health care programs of the Company on a basis no less favorable than senior executives of the Company.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts regular reviews of Board compensation, and considers publicly available board compensation data and best market practices.

The following table shows information concerning the compensation earned in fiscal year 20212023 bynon-employee directors who served on the Board during fiscal year 2021.

Name

  Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash ($)		   Stock
Awards ($)(a)		   Gift
Card ($)		   Total(b) 

Josephine Linden, Chair

  $160,000   $0   $10,000   $170,000 

Robert Galvin

  $76,542   $50,958   $10,000   $137,500 

Elizabeth Leykum

  $120,000   $0   $10,000   $130,000 

John T. McClain

  $120,000   $0   $10,000   $130,000 

Maureen Mullen Murphy

  $80,038   $19,962   $10,000   $110,000 

Jignesh Patel

  $120,000   $0   $10,000   $130,000 

Jonah Staw

  $107,500   $0   $10,000   $117,500 

2023 and are not named executive officers.*
Name
​​
Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
($)
​​
Stock Awards
($)(a)
​​
Gift Card
($)
​​
Total(b)
Josephine Linden, Chair
​​
$160,000
​​
$0
​​
$10,000
​​
$170,000
Robert Galvin
​​
$63,769
​​
$  63,731
​​
$10,000
​​
$137,500
Elizabeth Leykum
​​
$120,000
​​
$0
​​
$10,000
​​
$130,000
John T. McClain
​​
$120,000
​​
$0
​​
$10,000
​​
$130,000
Jignesh Patel
​​
$120,000
​​
$0
​​
$10,000
​​
$130,000
Jonah Staw
​​
$107,500
​​
$0
​​
$10,000
​​
$117,500
Maureen Mullen Murphy(c)
​​
$40,165
​​
$0
​​
$0
​​
$40,165
Jerome Griffith(d)
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
(a)

Amount represents portion of retainer that director elected to receive in shares of Lands’ End common stock, based on the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

(b)

The amounts in this column do not include amounts attributable to the discount on Lands’ End merchandise that are available generally to all Lands’ End salaried employees and non-employee directors.

(c)
Ms. Murphy served until the 2023 Annual Meeting, June 13, 2023.
(d)
During fiscal year 2023, Jerome Griffith, served as an employee director until the 2023 Annual Meeting, June 13, 2023. Mr. Griffith received no compensation for his services as a director. For a discussion of Mr. Griffith’s compensation as an employee see our 2023 Annual Meeting definitive proxy statement, filed May 2, 2024.
*
Mr. McLean, as an employee of the Company, did not receive separate or additional compensation for his service as a director during fiscal year 2023. See “Executive Compensation” for information relating to Mr. McLean’s fiscal year 2023 compensation.
16

As Mr. Griffith is an employee of the Company, he did not receive separate or additional compensation for his service as a director during fiscal year 2021. See “Executive Compensation” for information relating to Mr. Griffith’s fiscal year 2021 compensation.TABLE OF CONTENTS

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF THE COMPANY’S COMMON STOCK

The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 28, 20222024 for (1) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock; (2) each named executive officer; (3) each of our directors;current directors and nominees; and (4) all of our executive officers and directors as a group.

Name of Beneficial Owner(1)

  Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned 
           Number          Percent of Common
        Stock Outstanding        		 

Robert Galvin

   15,846   * 

James Gooch

   113,368   * 

Peter L. Gray

   135,529(2)   * 

Jerome Griffith

   696,144(3)   2.1% 

Elizabeth Leykum

   12,299   * 

Josephine Linden

   45,817   * 

John T. McClain

   6,054   * 

Maureen Mullen Murphy

   9,023   * 

Jignesh Patel

   22,000   * 

Sarah Rasmusen

   22,888   * 

Jonah Staw

   5,660   * 

Chieh Tsai

   52,268   * 

Directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons)

   1,136,896(4)   3.4% 

Greater than 5% Stockholders:

   

ESL Investments, Inc. and related entities, as a group(5)

   17,121,236(6)   51.2% 

Capital Research Global Investors(7)

   2,100,000   6.3% 

Thomas J. Tisch(8)

   1,995,102   6.0% 

Name of Beneficial Owner(1)
​​
Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned
 
​​
Number
​​
Percent of Common
Stock Outstanding
Robert Galvin
​​
29,686
​​
*
Peter L. Gray(2)
​​
156,411
​​
*
Elizabeth Leykum
​​
12,299
​​
*
Josephine Linden
​​
45,817
​​
*
John T. McClain
​​
11,054
​​
*
Bernard McCracken
​​
22,277
​​
*
Andrew J. McLean(3)
​​
61,677
​​
*
Alicia Parker(4)
​​
—
​​
—
Jignesh Patel
​​
22,000
​​
*
Sarah Rasmusen(5)
​​
28,749
​​
*
Angela Rieger
​​
54,401
​​
*
Jonah Staw
​​
5,660
​​
*
Directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)
​​
421,282(6)
​​
1.3%
 
​​
 
​​
 
Greater than 5% Stockholders:
​​
 
​​
 
ESL Investments, Inc. and related entities, as a group(7)
​​
17,116,376(8)
​​
54.4%
Thomas J. Tisch(9)
​​
2,120,573
​​
6.7%
Capital Research Global Investors(10)
​​
2,100,000
​​
6.7%
*

Represents less than 1% of outstanding common stock

stock.
(1)

Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table is c/o Lands’ End, Inc., 1 Lands’ End Lane, Dodgeville, Wisconsin 53595. We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC, which provide that beneficial ownership includes any shares over which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days after March 28, 2022,2024, through the exercise of a stock option or vesting of an RSU or any other right. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that all the persons and entities named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock that they beneficially own. We have based our calculation of the percentage ownership on 33,412,83531,491,974 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 28, 2022.

2024.
(2)

Includes 49,017 vested stock options.

(3)

Includes 294,11842,020 vested stock options.

(4)

Includes 343,135 vested stock options.

Ms. Parker is a nominee for initial election to the Board at the Annual Meeting.
(5)

On September 5, 2023, the employment of Sarah Rasmusen, Executive Vice President, Chief Innovation Officer, ceased in connection with a position elimination by the Company.

(6)
Includes 91,037 vested stock options.
(7)
Beneficial ownership and other information contained herein and in Footnote 8, is based on Amendment No. 26 to Schedule 13D reporting ownership as of March 16, 2022, (the “13D Filing”) ofForm 4 dated April 6, 2022 and information provided by Edward S. Lampert, ESL Investments, Inc. (“ESL”), ESL Partners, L.P. (“Partners”), and RBS Partners, L.P. (“RBS”). RBS is the general partner of, and may be deemed to indirectly beneficially own securities beneficially owned by, Partners. ESL is the general partner of, and may be deemed to indirectly beneficially own securities beneficially owned by, RBS. Mr. Lampert is the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director of, and may be deemed to indirectly

beneficially own securities beneficially owned by, ESL. The address of ESL Investments, Inc. and related entities is c/o ESL Investments, Inc. and related entities, as a group, 1170 Kane Concourse, Suite 200, Bay Harbor Islands, Florida 33154.
(6)(8)

Per the 13D Filing, Mr. Lampert possesses sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to 17,121,23617,116,376 shares, inclusive of 3,791 shares of Common Stock held by The Nicholas Floyd Lampert 2015 Trust and 3,791 shares of Common Stock held by The Nina Rose Lampert 2015 Trust; ESL possesses sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to 3,893 shares; Partners possesses sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to 3,893 shares; and RBS possesses sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to 3,893 shares.

(7)(9)
Beneficial ownership is based on Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G reporting ownership as of December 31, 2023. Mr. Tisch disclosed sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to 1,758,001 shares and reported shared voting power and shared dispositive power as to 362,572 shares. Mr. Tisch’s address is 712 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10065.
17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(10)
Beneficial ownership is based on the Capital Research Global Investors Amendment No. 7 to Schedule 13G reporting ownership as of December 31, 2020. Capital Research Global Investors disclosed sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to 2,100,000 shares. Capital Research Global Investors disclaims beneficial ownership as to these shares. The address of Capital Research Global Investors is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, California 90071.

(8)

Beneficial ownership is based on Schedule 13G reporting ownership as of March 1, 2021. Mr. Tisch disclosed sole voting power and sole dispositive power as to 1,632,530 shares and reported shared voting power and shared dispositive power as to 362,572 shares. Mr. Tisch’s address is 655 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10065.

Restrictions related to Equity Transactions

Under the Company’sTransactions; Insider Trading Policy

The Company has adopted an Insider Trading Policy, ourdesigned to promote compliance with insider trading laws, rules and regulations, as well as applicable exchange listing standards. The policy is applicable to the Company’s officers, employees, members of the Board of Directors and directorsother designated persons with access to Company material nonpublic information, as well as to family members residing with them and any entities or family members whose transactions in the Company’s securities are directed by or subject to their influence and control. The Insider Trading Policy prohibits the trading of Company securities on the basis of material, nonpublic information and establishes regular blackout periods wherein certain designated persons are prohibited from trading in Company securities. It also prohibits engaging in, among other things, short sale transactions and hedging transactions with respect to Company securities, including through the use of financial instruments such as prepaid variable forwards, equity swaps, collars and private exchange funds. Our employeesfunds, and directors also are prohibited fromprohibits holding Company securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan.
18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Introduction

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information to assist you in understanding the fiscal year 20212023 compensation of the executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table, whom we refer to as our “named executive officers.” Our named executive officers for fiscal year 20212023 are:

Jerome Griffith,Andrew J. McLean, Chief Executive Officer

James Gooch, President andBernard McCracken, Chief Financial Officer

Peter L. Gray, Executive Vice President,Chief Commercial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel

Chieh Tsai,Angela Rieger, Executive Vice President, Chief ProductTransformation Officer

Sarah Rasmusen, Former Executive Vice President, Chief CustomerInnovation Officer

At the outset of

During fiscal year 2021,2023, Mr. McCracken served as Interim Chief Financial Officer until September 2023, when he was appointed Chief Financial Officer. In June 2023, Ms. Rieger became an executive officer due to changes in responsibilities. Ms. Rasmusen’s employment ceased in connection with a position elimination on September 5, 2023.
Executive Summary
Fiscal year 2023 was a year of transition for Lands’ End. As planned, Andrew McLean succeeded Jerome Griffith served as Chief Executive Officer at the conclusion of fiscal year 2022. In contrast to fiscal year 2022, where macroeconomic factors had a profound impact on our business, during fiscal year 2023 inflationary pressures subsided, freight costs normalized, and President,costs of raw materials, packaging materials, labor, transportation, energy, fuel and Mr. Gooch served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officerother inputs necessary for the production and Chief Operating Officer.distribution of our products, stabilized. In Marchaddition, over the course of the year, we focused on shifting the business toward higher margin selling, addressing inventory management challenges from fiscal year 2022, introducing and emphasizing newness into our product offering, shifting our customer focus from demographics to behaviors in order to better attract and retain our key customer cohorts and refinancing our term loan. In these areas, we made sizable progress, which resulted in Adjusted EBITDA of $84.3 million, an approximately 20% increase over fiscal year 2022.
Based on our performance relative to pre-established adjusted EBITDA goals, our annual incentive plan for fiscal year 2023 paid out at 78% of target. However, our long-term performance-based awards for the fiscal 2021 Mr. Griffith transitionedthrough 2023 period yielded no payout and those awards expired without vesting.
Our return to office efforts continued over the rolecourse of President to Mr. Gooch, and Mr. Gooch was promoted to President and retained his role as Chief Financial Officer. With a change of responsibilities in March 2021, Ms. Rasmusen became an executive officer.

Executive Summary — Impact of and Actions taken in Response to COVID-19 in Fiscal Year 2021

During 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic continued to impact the Company andfiscal year 2023. Building on our business. As a result, we continued to follow the practices that we developed during the initial response to the pandemic.

What Actions Did We Take?Why?
Business Actions
Continued enhanced health and safety measures in workplace, in accordance with public health guidance and best practicesProtected health of our workforce and reinforced concern for well-being
Converted employee fitness center to COVID-19 vaccination site administered by Iowa County Health DepartmentSupported health and well-being of local and surrounding community, which is home to many employees, customers and friends
Continued remote work policies, social distancing, masking and other requirements in offices, distribution centers and retail storesMaintained health and safety of employees and customers, and aligned with governmental ordinances

Compensation Actions
Reinstated merit increasesReturned to practice of annual merit increase after suspending for 2020 as a cost control measure
Reinstated 401(k) matchReturned to offering match as a valuable employee benefit to encourage individual retirement savings
Returned to long-term incentives in form of 100% equity awardWith stabilization of stock price in 2021, ability to continue to align with stockholder interests
Maintained targets under 2021 annual incentive and 2019, 2020 and 2021 long-term performance awardsEnsured alignment with internal plans in face of continued uncertainty and reinforced long-term nature of awards

The Compensation Committee believes that management performed extremely well by exceeding financial targets and managing its operations, while navigating the COVID-19 pandemic“collaboration weeks” where, beginning in fiscal year 2021.

During fiscal year 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic impacted our distribution process, third-party manufacturing partners and logistics partners, including shipping delays due to port congestion, and closure of certain third-party manufacturing facilities and production lines. These disruptions resulted in later timing of fiscal year 2021 inventory receipts that caused, at times, lower inventory positions and higher than normal back orders, as manufacturing, transport and receipt of inbound product was delayed. In addition, due to the supply chain disruptions we experienced increased freight and distribution costs during the second half of fiscal year 2021.

Despite these challenges, our revenue increased 14.7% and Adjusted EBITDA increased 39%, compared with fiscal year 2020. In addition, although the operational and financial impact of these challenges2022 many employees were not foreseen when the fiscal year 2021 annual incentive plan and long-term incentive plan targets were set, no adjustment to the targets, for either the annual or long-term plans were made by the Compensation Committee when evaluating fiscal year 2021 financial performance and achievement of goals.

At the same time, we managed the COVID-19 pandemic from a human capital and social perspective. Most corporate employees continuedencouraged to work from our corporate offices one designated week per month, we have further expanded our return to office efforts, with our senior management (Vice President and above) and most other corporate staff, working in a remote work model, while on-site distributionperson three weeks every month. We believe this transition back to office has reinforced our commitment to culture, collaboration and call centers were fully staffed and operated with extra caution to minimize any spread of COVID-19, through screening, social distancing, masking protocols, and the administration of other protective measures. In early 2021, we converted our employee fitness center (which was underutilized due to a substantial number of employees working remotely, as well as local orders regarding the operation of fitness centers) into a COVID-19 vaccination clinic for use by the Iowa County Health Department.innovation.

19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The Compensation Committee believes that our long-term success is directly related to our ability to attract, motivate and retain highly talented executives who are committed to our mission, results and cultural beliefs. The Compensation Committee has developed a compensation philosophy for our senior executives designed to
pay-for-performance. Accordingly, the total compensation packages provided to our named executive officers generally include both annual and long-term incentive opportunities that are linked to performance measures or are otherwise “at risk” due to market fluctuations and potential for forfeiture. For fiscal year 2021,2023, approximately 77%78% of our CEO’s target compensation was considered at-risk, and 66%approximately 63% of our other named executive officers’ target compensation was considered at-risk based on financial and relative total stockholder return (TSR) performance measures or the possibility of forfeiture.

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION - CEO

LOGO

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION - OTHER NAMED

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

LOGO


Our compensation packages are designed in large measure to motivate and encourage executives to drive performance and achieve superior results for the Company and its stockholders. They also reflect other important considerations, such as the value of the position in the marketplace, levels of job responsibility, individual performance and the need to attract and retain top executive talent. The Compensation Committee grants equity- basedequity-based incentives to align management’s and stockholders’ interests. While the Compensation Committee seeks to utilize compensation and benefit arrangements that reflect the pay-for-performance compensation philosophy, it recognizes that from time to time it may be appropriate for the Company to provide additional inducements, such as sign-on awards, spot bonuses and other provisions, to recruit, retain, reward and motivate highly qualified executives. Compensation agreements are discussed in “Employment Arrangements” below. No such additional inducements were utilized for any of the named executive officers in fiscal year 2021.

2023.

Executive Compensation Program: Key Elements

The key elements of our compensation program for our executives include base salary, annual cash incentive opportunities, long-term performance-based incentive opportunities and long-term time-based equity awards.

Annual Compensation

•

Base Salary—Base salary is the fixed element of each executive’s cash compensation, and provides executives with an appropriate level of financial certainty.

•

Annual Incentive Plan—Our annual incentive program seeks to motivate executives by providing opportunities to earn annual cash awards which are at risk and based on achievement of annual financial objectives established by the Compensation Committee.

Long-Term Compensation

•

Long-Term Performance-Based Awards—Our long-term incentive programs are designed to motivate executives to focus on long-term companyCompany performance through awards whichthat are at risk and based on multi-year performance periods, thatand to reinforce accountability by linking executive compensation to achievement of performance goals. These programs seek to align our executive’s goalsexecutives’ compensation with our strategic direction and initiatives, which the Compensation Committee believes will result in increased returns to itsour stockholders. These awards have taken the form of either equity or cash in the past several years.

20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

•

Long-Term Time-Based Awards—Our long-term incentive programs also include time-based awards of equity that are at risk. The multi-year vesting requirements of time-based awards are designed to promote retention and encourage executive officers to adopt longer-term approaches to our business. Time-based equity compensation also provides alignment with our stockholders, as value received will be consistent with return to our stockholders.

There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between annual and long-term incentive compensation. Instead, the Compensation Committee takes a holistic approach to executive compensation and the balance of the compensation elements for each executive individually. For fiscal year 2021,2023, approximately 45%44% of our CEO’s target compensation and approximately 60%65% of our other named executive officers’ target

compensation was annual in nature, while 55%approximately 56% of our CEO’s target compensation and 40%approximately 35% of our other named executive officers’ target compensation was long-term in nature.

ANNUAL VS. LONG-TERM COMPENSATION - CEO

LOGO

ANNUAL VS. LONG-TERM COMPENSATION - OTHER NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

LOGO

Additionally, approximately half of our CEO and other named executive officers’ long-term compensation was delivered in performance-based awards.


 
How Elements Are Used to Achieve Our Compensation Objectives

The Compensation Committee believes that a fair and effective way to motivate executives to produce superior results for stockholders is to increase the proportion of an executive’s total compensation that is performance-based or otherwise “at risk”, including equity compensation, relative to the executive’s ability to influence those results. Additionally, the Compensation Committee believes that the value of incentive compensation should depend upon the performance of the Company in a specified performance or vesting period. Under our incentive compensation structure, the highest amount of compensation can be achieved through consistent superior performance over successive time periods. This approach is designed to provide incentives for managing long-term growth, while minimizing short-term excessive risk taking.

risk-taking.

During fiscal year 2021,2023, the Compensation Committee sought to achieve the objectives of our compensation program for our named executive officers through the grant of annual and long-term incentive awards. The fiscal year 20212023 annual incentive awards for the named executive officers offered an opportunity to earn cash compensation based upon achievement of anannual and quarterly adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) goalgoals for fiscal year 2021.2023. The goal settinggoal-setting process is discussed below in “Fiscal Year 20212023 Annual Incentive Opportunity”. In fiscal year 2021,2023, the Compensation Committee also granted long-term time-based equity awards that will vest over a three-year period, assuming continued service and long-term performance-based equity awards, which vest based on achievement of cumulative adjusted EBITDA and revenue goals for a three-year period.

period, and are subject to a relative total stockholder return (“Relative TSR”) modifier which is based on the Company’s total return to stockholders over the measurement period relative to a custom peer group. We use adjusted EBITDA in both our annual and long-term incentive program as we believe it is a key driver of long-term, sustained stockholder value.

Our target Annual Incentive Plan (As Amended and Restated) (“AIP”) awards and our long-term incentives are established based on a percentage of base salary. As the participating executive’s base salary is determined, in part, on his or hertheir past performance, an award opportunity that is based on a multiple of that base salary also reflects, in part, his or hertheir past performance.
21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Following the end of a performance period, the Compensation Committee certifies the level of achievement against the applicable financial performance goals established under itsthe annual and long-term performance-based incentive programs, but retains the ability to exercise positive or negative discretion to adjust payout in relation to our annual and long-term performance. The Compensation Committee did not exercise any such discretion for fiscal year 20212023 payouts for any of the named executive officers.

Fiscal Year 20212023 Base Salaries

Base salaries are established at levels that generally reflect the past performance, experience, expected future contributions and responsibilities of the executive officer. The importance of the executive officer’s position, external pay data, market competitiveness and internal pay equity also are considered, as well as the extent of any promotions or other change in the executive’s responsibilities.

The following table sets forth the base salary which became effective duringas of fiscal year 2021 (on May 22, 2021)end 2023 for each of the named executive officers, and thetheir prior year fiscal year end base salary:

            Name             

  Fiscal 2020
Base Salary		   Fiscal 2021
Base Salary		   %
Increase		 

Jerome Griffith

  $1,050,000   $1,050,000    —   

James Gooch

  $695,000   $700,000    0.7% 

Peter L. Gray

  $570,000   $590,000    3.5% 

Chieh Tsai

  $500,000   $515,000    3.0% 

Sarah Rasmusen

  $425,000   $450,000    5.9% 

Name
​​
FY2022 Base
Salary*
​​
FY2023 Base Salary*
​​
% Increase
Andrew J. McLean
​​
$1,050,000
​​
$1,050,000
​​
—
Bernard McCracken
​​
$317,240
​​
$525,000
​​
65.5%
Peter L. Gray
​​
$675,000
​​
$675,000
​​
—
Angela Rieger
​​
$450,000
​​
$500,000
​​
11.1%
Sarah Rasmusen
​​
$463,500
​​
$472,770**
​​
2.0%
*
As of fiscal year end. See discussion of mid-year increases below.
**
As of September 5, 2023, Ms. Rasmusen’s last day of employment.
The named executive officers’ base salaries were each set based on a combination of factors considered by Mr. GriffithMcLean in recommending the base salaries of the other named executives (other than Mr. McLean, whose base salary was determined solely by the Compensation Committee), and by the Compensation Committee in approving all of the base salaries (including Mr. Griffiths’)McLean’s), including an assessment of individual achievements, contributions to the performance of the Company, changes in responsibilities, and peer group, general industry and survey comparisons.

Mr. McCracken’s salary increased to $323,585 on May 20, 2023, and in addition to his base salary, from January 28, 2023 through September 13, 2023, Mr. McCracken also received an additional $15,000 per month for serving as Interim Chief Financial Officer. Mr. McCracken's salary was increased to $525,000 in connection with his appointment as Chief Financial Officer on September 14, 2023. Ms. Rieger’s base salary was increased to $500,000 effective January 22, 2024, in recognition of certain increased responsibilities.

Fiscal Year 20212023 Performance Measures and Goals

As we rely upon “at risk” compensation to motivate our executives, in addition to time-based equity awards, in 20212023 we utilized two forms of performance-based awards: awards based on goals set for fiscal year 20212023 under the AIP (“20212023 AIP”) and performance-based equity awards.

Under the 20212023 AIP, we used, as in past years, an adjusted EBITDA measure.measure (see discussion of this measure, and how it differs from reported Adjusted EBITDA below, in “Fiscal Year 20212023 Annual Incentive Opportunity”). The adjusted EBITDA targets were established in February 2021.April 2023. When establishing the performance goals for the 20212023 AIP and also for the long-term performance-based equity awards granted in 2021,2023, the Compensation Committee considered such factors as fiscal year 20202022 financial results, overall fiscal year 20212023 financial goals, our long-range plan, our competitive position, and market trends, as well as the general state of the economy and our business, and the continued uncertainty posed by COVID-19.

business.

With respect to the long-term performance-based equity awards, performance goals are based on an adjusted EBITDA and revenue goals, which considered the factors cited above, and were established in February 2021April 2023 for the cumulative three-year period from fiscal year 20212023 through fiscal year 2023.

2025.

Fiscal Year 20212023 Annual Incentive Opportunity

For the 20212023 AIP, the Compensation Committee approved an adjusted EBITDA performance measure (“20212023 AIP EBITDA”) that consisted of quarterly and annual goals, which cumulatively accounted for 100% of
22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the annual incentive opportunity for our named executive officers. The 20212023 AIP EBITDA measure differs from “Adjusted EBITDA.”EBITDA” which is a key metric reported by the Company. Adjusted EBITDA is used by management to measure business performance, in an effort to encourage growth and create increased stockholder value through the efficient use of corporate assets. For purposes of the 20212023 AIP, reported Adjusted EBITDA results are subject to further adjustment as detailed below (see Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operationsof our Annual Report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA).

Given the challenging business conditions present at the end of fiscal year 2022 and the beginning of fiscal year 2023, and in light of the Company’s financial performance in fiscal year 2022, the Compensation Committee deemed it critical that the opportunity to earn incentive compensation under the 2023 AIP be balanced with the need of the Company to maintain compliance with its debt covenants. Accordingly, in adopting the 2023 AIP, the Compensation Committee provided that no bonus amounts could be earned if such bonus amounts would cause the Company to fail to comply with the financial covenants included in its term loan. Since debt covenant compliance was to be measured quarterly, the 2023 AIP contained quarterly, as well as, annual goals. In addition, to incent management to deliver comparatively stronger results in fiscal year 2023, the metrics provided for both a “target” level of performance, which equated to 75% payout, and a “stretch target” level of performance, which would need to be attained to earn a 100% payout.

To determine 20212023 AIP EBITDA performance, we first calculate Adjusted EBITDA, computed as operating income (loss) appearing on our statement of operations for the applicable reporting period, adjusted for depreciation, amortization, gains/(losses) on sales of assets and other items we determine affect the comparability of financial results from period to period. Then, in determining financial goal achievement relative to the 20212023 AIP EBITDA measure, the Compensation Committee is required to adjust either the performance target or actual Adjusted EBITDA results to reflect the following occurrences affecting our results during the performance period:

the effects of currency fluctuations in comparison to plan currency rates;

gains or losses from litigation, claim judgments, or regulatory proceedings, including product recalls or legal and insurance settlements that, in each case, individually exceed $500,000;

the effect of changes in laws, regulations, or accounting principles, methods or estimates;

write down or impairment of assets;

the gain or loss from the sale or discontinuance of a business segment, division, unit or unit,product group, and the planned, unrealized corporate post-incentive adjusted EBITDA for this business segment, division, unit or unit;

product group;

results from an unplanned acquired business and costs related to the unplanned acquisition;

restructuring and workforce severance costs pursuant to a plan approved by the Board and Chief Executive Officer;

the impact of the unplanned termination or loss of store leases; and

unusual and infrequently occurring items as defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP).

Opportunities under the AIP for the participating executives are generally established upon hire and reviewed when the Compensation Committee reviews annual compensation or at the time a compensation package for a participating executive is otherwise approved, and reflects the participating executive’s relative level of responsibility and potential to affect our overall performance. The target award opportunity under the 20212023 AIP was consistent with past practice and was set at 100% of base salary for Mr. Griffith,McLean, and 75% of base salary for the other named executive officers. Mr. McCracken’s target award opportunity was initially set at 40% and increased to 75% due to his appointment as Chief Financial Officer. Threshold, target, stretch target and maximum levels of 2021for quarterly and annual performance under the 2023 AIP EBITDA were established in February 2021.

PayoutApril 2023.

For the annual measure, as discussed above, performance levels were set at: threshold for performance at reported Adjusted12.5% below target 2023 AIP EBITDA for fiscal year 2020,2023, target at our internal plan, which had been
23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

established in February 2021,April 2023 and represented a 13.5% increase over fiscal year 2022 performance, stretch target, which represented performance at 25% over fiscal year 2022 performance, and maximum at an approximately 26%25% overachievement of the stretch target for fiscal year 2023. For the quarterly measures, the performance levels per quarter were set equal to 25% of their annual counterparts, threshold each quarter was 12.5% below the target, the stretch target was set at an approximately 10% overachievement of the target, and maximum at an approximately 25% overachievement of stretch target. The annual incentive, which provided 100% payout for achievement of the stretch targets, equally weighted the achievement of quarterly goals and the annual goal, with 50% of the incentive opportunity based on each. The following table summarizes the plan design, metric, and performance levels:

Metric
​​
Threshold
​​
Target
​​
Stretch Target
​​
Maximum

Metric

2023 AIP EBITDA and payout
opportunity for each of the
four fiscal quarters
​Threshold
(50% of Target Payout)​
$17.5 million
(6.25% payout)
​Target
(100% of Target Payout)​
$20 million
(9.38% payout)
​Maximum
(200% of Target Payout)​
$22 million
(12.5% payout)
​​
$27.5 million
(25% payout)
2021
2023 AIP EBITDA and payout
opportunity for full fiscal year
​$​87.0
$70 million
(25% payout)
​​
$80 million
(37.5% payout)
100.6​​
$88 million
(50% payout)
​​
$
127.0110 million
(100% payout)

The Compensation Committee views adjustedAdjusted EBITDA growth as a key metric and driver of stockholder value. As designed, each of the 2021four fiscal quarters and the full fiscal year was measured independently and the 2023 AIP payout for each period depended upon at least threshold performance. If threshold performance was not achieved for a particular period, no payout would reward achievement equal tobe made under the prior year (i.e. a flat year2023 AIP for profitability) with a 50% payout. Falling short of a flat year would result in no payout.

that period.

At the time it set the targets, the Compensation Committee believed that performance at the target level, a 16%13.5% improvement over fiscal year 20202022 performance, was attainable, yet challenging, given multiple factors, including uncertainty related to supply chain challenges, and that performance at the continuing COVID-19 pandemic impact on areas of manufacturingstretch target level required for a 100% payout would be even more challenging to achieve.
Our quarterly and potential shifts in consumer buying behavior.

We achieved 2021annual actual 2023 AIP EBITDA, of approximately $120.9 million, resulting inand the resultant payout, was as follows:

Time Period
​​
2023 AIP EBITDA
​​
Payout
Percentage
First Quarter
​​
$19.5 million
​​
9%
Second Quarter
​​
$15.8 million
​​
—
Third Quarter
​​
$17.3 million
​​
—
Fourth Quarter
​​
$31.7 million
​​
25%
Full Fiscal Year
​​
$84.3 million
​​
44%
Total Payout Percentage
​​
​​
78%
These results yielded a payout of 177%78% of target for each of the named executive officers and all other AIP participants. Neither the Compensation Committee nor the Board exercised any discretion with respect to the payout amounts, which are set forth below.
Name*
​​
Target Incentive
for fiscal year
2023
​​
Annual Incentive
Earned and Paid for
fiscal year 2023
Andrew J. McLean
​​
$1,070,192
​​
$834,750
Bernard McCracken
​​
$396,842
​​
$309,536
Peter L. Gray
​​
$515,985
​​
$402,469
Angela Rieger
​​
$345,433
​​
$269,437
*
As Ms. Rasmusen departed the Company prior to the payout date, under the terms of the AIP she was not eligible to receive a payout.
24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Name

  Target
Incentive for
fiscal year
2021		   Actual Incentive
Earned for fiscal
year 2021		 

Jerome Griffith

  $1,050,000   $1,858,500 

James Gooch

  $523,846   $927,208 

Peter L. Gray

  $437,885   $775,056 

Chieh Tsai

  $382,789   $667,536 

Sarah Rasmusen

  $331,731   $587,163 

Fiscal Year 20212023 Long-Term Compensation Opportunities

2021

2023 Long-Term Incentive Structure: 20212023 PRSU Awards and 20212023 RSU Awards

For fiscal year 2021,2023, our long-term incentive structure (“LTI”) structure had two components: awards of performance-based restricted stock units (each, a “PRSU” and the award, the “2021“2023 PRSU Awards”) and awards of time-based restricted stock units (each, an “RSU” and the award, the “2021“2023 RSU Awards”) under the Lands’ End, Inc. Amended and Restated 2017 Stock Plan (the “2017 Stock Plan”).

In March 2021, we announced organizational changes designed to advance our strategic growth plans and accelerate the pace of execution against our long-term goals. As part of these changes:

Mr. Gooch was promoted to President and, in addition to his role as Chief Financial Officer, assumed oversight, each weighted equally at 50% of the Company’s operating unitstotal LTI value.

Each of eCommerce, International, Outfitters, Third Party and Retail, with the heads of each operating unit reporting to him.

Mr. Gray assumed oversight of the Company’s distribution center operations.

Ms. Rasmusen was promoted to Executive Vice President, adding oversight to the Company’s information technology and performance marketing functions.

In recognition of the changes in responsibilities and as part of its annual compensation determinations based on market and industry data, the Compensation Committee increased the long-term incentive compensation (at target) for fiscal year 2021 for Mr. Gooch, Mr. Gray and Ms. Rasmusen. In addition, after reviewing market and industry data, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Griffith’s and Ms. Tsai’s target LTI opportunities. The target incentive percentages for the named executive officers priorhas a target incentive. For Mr. McLean the target incentive is $2,520,000 and after such changes, are asfor Mr. Gray, Ms. Rieger and Ms. Rasmusen the target incentive was set forth onat 110% of base salary. At the following table:

   % of Base Salary

Name

  2020 LTI Target 2021 LTI Target

Jerome Griffith

  220% 240%

James Gooch

  100% 135%

Peter L. Gray

  100% 110%

Chieh Tsai

  100% 110%

Sarah Rasmusen

  100% 110%

2021time the LTI grants were made, Mr. McCracken’s target incentive was set at 50% of base salary. Beginning with fiscal year 2024 awards, Mr. McCracken’s target incentive is expected to be set at 110% of base salary.

2023 PRSU Awards

The 20212023 PRSU Awards are intended to focus the named executive officers on our long-term performance and align their interests with those of our stockholders. Each PRSU represents a contingent right to receive one share of our common stock upon satisfaction of adjusted EBITDA (75% weighting) (“20212023 PRSU EBITDA”)

and revenue (25% weighting) vesting conditions for the cumulative period comprised of fiscal years 20212023 through 20232025, and are subject to the Relative TSR modifier which is based on the Company’s total return to stockholders over a measurement period relative to a custom peer group and continued service. The 20212023 PRSU Awards will vest, if at all, when the Compensation Committee determines whether a requisite level of performance has been achieved. The determination will take place after the conclusion of the third year of the performance period. Each named executive officer may earn a number of PRSUs and be issued the related number of shares, based on the Company’s performance relative to the goals set at the time the award was approved in February 2021. The Compensation Committee determined the performance measures and established threshold, target and maximum goals for 2021 PRSUcumulative adjusted EBITDA and revenue forgoals, and the 2021 PRSU Awards.

Relative TSR modifier. All goals were set in April 2023.

The number of shares for the 20212023 PRSU Awards at target level of performance to each of the named executive officers, representing 50% of his or hertheir LTI value on March 19, 2021 (usingJune 14, 2023 (calculated using a value per share of $29.95,$8.54, the closing price of the Common Stock on the date of the award), and the grant date fair value of the award (based(calculated using a value per share of $9.74, the award date closing price as adjusted to reflect the estimated value of the Relative TSR modifier; value adjustment calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation, described in Note 5. Stock-Based Compensation in our Annual Report on such closing price) was asForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2024), are each set forth on the table below:

Name

  Number of Shares
underlying 2021 PRSU
Award at Target
Performance
(“2021 Target  Shares”)		   Grant Date
Fair Value		 

Jerome Griffith

   42,070   $1,259,997 

James Gooch

   15,663   $469,107 

Peter L. Gray

   10,467   $313,487 

Chieh Tsai

   9,181   $274,971 

Sarah Rasmusen

   7,804   $233,730 

Name
​​
Number of Shares underlying
2023 PRSU Award at Target
Performance
(“2023 Target Shares”)
​​
Grant Date Fair Value
Andrew J. McLean
​​
147,540
​​
$1,437,040
Bernard McCracken
​​
9,286
​​
$90,446
Peter L. Gray
​​
43,471
​​
$423,408
Angela Rieger
​​
28,981
​​
$282,275
Sarah Rasmusen*
​​
29,850
​​
$290,739
*
Ms. Rasmusen’s 2023 PRSU Award expired when her employment with the Company ceased.
The definition of 20212023 PRSU EBITDA is substantially the same as the definition of 20212023 AIP EBITDA (as indicated above). Revenue for the purposes of the 20212023 PRSU Awards, is revenue, as determined by GAAP. Under the 20212023 PRSU Awards, a threshold level of performance for a goal will generate a preliminary payout atcalculation of 50% of 20212023 Target Shares, a target level of performance will generate a preliminary payout atcalculation of 100% of 20212023 Target Shares and a maximum level of performance will result in a preliminary payout atcalculation of 200% of 20212023 Target Shares. The preliminary payout percentage calculation between each of threshold and target payout and between target and maximum payout is based on straight-line (linear) interpolations. Each metric is considered independently, and payout for that metric will be weighted according to the weighting associated with the metric. Once the preliminary payout percentage is determined, such amount is
25

TABLE OF CONTENTS

subject to adjustment by applying the Relative TSR Modifier. The Relative TSR Modifier reflects a filtered subset of the combined S&P TMI Consumer Discretionary and Completion Consumer Discretionary indices based on the following criteria:
Market cap between $100M-$2B
Revenues between $500-$5B
Volatility greater than 50%
Correlation greater than 0.45
Companies headquartered in the U.S.
Companies with more than 2 years of public trading history
The foregoing approach yielded a comparator group of 38 companies. Application of the Relative TSR Modifier may not result in a payout in excess of 200% of target, and the Relative TSR Modifier is capped at 100% if our absolute TSR during the Relative TSR measurement period of April 1, 2023 through January 31, 2026 is negative.
A table summarizingsummary of the plan design for the 20212023 PRSU Awards is set forth below:

Metric

(cumulative three-year performance)

  Weighting Payout at
Threshold		 Payout at
Target		 Payout at
Maximum

2021 PRSU EBITDA

  75% 50% 100% 200%

Revenue

  25% 50% 100% 200%

Metric
(cumulative three-year performance)
​​
Weighting
​​
Preliminary
Payout at
Threshold
(50% of
Target)
​​
Preliminary
Payout at
Target
(100% of
Target)
​​
Preliminary
Payout at
Maximum
(200% of
Target)
2023 PRSU EBITDA
​​
75%
​​
50%
​​
100%
​​
200%
Revenue
​​
25%
​​
50%
​​
100%
​​
200%
Relative TSR Modifier (subject to limitations discussed above):
Percentile Rank
​​
Payout
Multiplier
≥75th Percentile
​​
125%
50th Percentile
​​
100%
≤25th Percentile
​​
75%
Since the levels of achievement for the metrics are based on a three-year cumulative amount, fiscal year 20212023 performance, alone, did not trigger any achievement.

2021

All grants under the 2017 Stock Plan, including the 2023 PRSUs and any other grants to an individual in the same fiscal year, are subject to the limitations of the 2017 Stock Plan, including Section 7.1(b) which imposes a per participant limit.
2023 RSU Awards

The 20212023 RSU Awards are intended to focus the named executive officers on our long-term performance, promote retention and align their interests with those of our stockholders. Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive one share of our common stock upon satisfaction of the vesting conditions. The 20212023 RSU Awards will vest, subject to satisfaction of vesting conditions, including continued service, on the first, second and third anniversaries of the award date (with respect to 25%, 25% and 50% of the 20212023 RSU Awards), which was March 19, 2021.June 14, 2023.
26

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The number of shares for awards was determined by dividing the desired value (in case of the 20212023 RSU Awards, 50% of the executive’s LTI value) by the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The

closing price of our common stock on the award date was $29.95.$8.54. Accordingly, the number of shares for the 20212023 RSU Awards made to each of the named executive officers, and the grant date fair value of the award (based on such closing price), was as set forth on the table below:

Name

  Number of Shares
underlying 2021
RSU Award		   Grant Date
Fair Value		 

Jerome Griffith

   42,070   $1,259,997 

James Gooch

   15,663   $469,107 

Peter L. Gray

   10,467   $313,487 

Chieh Tsai

   9,181   $274,971 

Sarah Rasmusen

   7,804   $233,730 

Name
​​
Number of Shares
underlying 2023
RSU Award
​​
Grant Date Fair Value
Andrew J. McLean
​​
147,540
​​
$1,259,992
Bernard McCracken
​​
9,286
​​
$79,302
Peter L. Gray
​​
43,471
​​
$371,242
Angela Rieger
​​
28,981
​​
$247,498
Sarah Rasmusen*
​​
29,850
​​
$254,919
*
Ms. Rasmusen’s 2023 RSU Award expired when her employment with the Company ceased.
Prior Performance-Based Awards Providing Fiscal Year 2023 Compensation Opportunity
2021 Compensation

2019 PRSU Awards

In fiscal 2019,year 2021, our LTI included performance-based restricted stock unit awards (“2019Awards of PRSUs under the 2017 Stock Plan (the “2021 PRSU Awards”) for a number of shares of Common Stock (the “2019 Target Shares”). Each PRSUwhich represented a contingentthe right to receive one shareshares of ourthe Company’s common stock (the “2021 Target Shares”) upon the satisfaction of a cumulative adjusted EBITDA measure (“20192021 PRSU EBITDA”), weighted 75% and cumulative revenue, weighted 25%, each based on a cumulative three-year period, comprised of fiscal year 2019years 2021 through fiscal year 20212023 and subject to continued employment. Both performance goals were established in February 2019March 2021 and were not adjusted for the impact of COVID-19.

any other factors.

The definition of 20192021 PRSU EBITDA was substantially the same as the definition of 20212023 AIP EBITDA (as indicated above). Revenue for the purposes of the 20192021 PRSU Awards, was revenue, as determined by GAAP. Under the 20192021 PRSU Awards, a threshold level of performance for a goal would generate a payout athave resulted in vesting of 50% of the 20192021 Target Shares, a target level of performance would generate a payouthave resulted in vesting at 100% of the 20192021 Target Shares, and athe maximum levelopportunity would have resulted in vesting of performance would result in a payout at 200% of the 20192021 Target Shares. TheAny payout percentage between each of threshold and target payout and between target and maximum payout waswould be based on straight-line (linear) interpolations. Each metric was considered independently, and payout for that metric was weighted according to the weighting associated with the metric. A table summarizing the plan design for the 20192021 PRSU Awards is set forth below:

Metric
(cumulative three-year
performance)
​​
Weighting
​​
Threshold
(50% payout)
​​
Target
(100% payout)
​​
Maximum
(200%)

Metric

(cumulative three-year
performance)

2021 PRSU EBITDA
​

Weighting

​
75%

Threshold

(50% payout)

​		​

Target

(100% payout)

$305 million
​

Maximum
(200% payout)

​
$340 million
​​
$400 million

2019 PRSU EBITDA

Revenue
​75%​
25%
$225 million​​
$270 million4.9 billion
​$325 million

Revenue

​
$5.2 billion
25%​​
$4.45.7 billion
$4.65 billion$5.0 billion

Actual results for the cumulative performance period, calculated in accordance with the 20192021 PRSU Awards and as certified by the Compensation Committee on March 24, 2022April 3, 2024 were 20192021 PRSU EBITDA of $288$275.7 million and Revenue of $4.51 billion, yielding a payout of 118% of$4.665 billion. As these results were both below the 2019threshold set under the 2021 PRSU Awards, no 2021 Target Shares.Shares were earned and the awards expired unvested. The Committee did not adjust the performance goals or exercise any discretion in determining that no shares were earned under the payout for the 20192021 PRSU Awards.

The number of shares of Common Stock issued to each of the named executive officers upon vesting of the 2019 PRSU Awards on March 24, 2022 is as set forth on the table below:

Name

Number of Shares Issued Upon
Vesting of 2019 PRSU Awards

Jerome Griffith

86,642

James Gooch

25,316

Peter L. Gray

20,740

Chieh Tsai

18,753

Sarah Rasmusen

9,844

Other Compensation Elements

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

We provide our named executive officers with certain limited perquisites and other personal benefits that the Compensation Committee deems reasonable and consistent with our overall compensation program or necessary to achieve certain executive hire and retention objectives. For fiscal year 2021,2023, these perquisites included the opportunity for each named executive officer to receive an annual physical examination at our expense, which is
27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

intended to promote proactive management of executive health, and the opportunity to receive the same discounts on Lands’ End merchandise that are extended to all Lands’ End employees.

Retirement Plan

The Lands’ End, Inc. Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”) allows participants to contribute towards retirement (including catch-up contributions) on a pre-tax basis, subject to Internal Revenue Service annual contribution limits. The Retirement Plan allows Roth-after-tax contributions as well as pre-tax contributions of up to 75% of eligible compensation (or the limit determined by the Internal Revenue Service). We also make matching contributions to the Retirement Plan in an amount equal to 50% of the participant’s first 6% of contributions, starting the quarterfirst day of the first full calendar month following one year of service by the participant. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, our Retirement Plan match was suspended from March until the end of fiscal year 2020, but was reinstated in full for fiscal year 2021.

Severance Benefits

We provide severance benefits to our named executive officers pursuant to executive severance agreements each has entered into with Lands’ End. The executive severance agreements help us attract and retain executives in a talent marketplace where severance provisions are commonly offered, while protecting our interests through post-employment non-disclosure, non-solicitation and non-competition restrictions. Under the executive severance agreements, subject to the executive’s execution of a release of claims against the Company and its affiliates, severance benefits are provided for involuntary termination by Lands’ End without “Cause” (as defined in each executive’s agreement) or termination by the executive officer for “Good Reason” (as defined in each executive’s agreement). See “—Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment” below for additional details on the terms, conditions and benefits received under a qualifying termination under the executive severance agreements.

Awards under an annual or a long-term incentive program are payable to a certain extent in the event of a termination of employment as a result of death or disability during a performance period if certain conditions are met. See “—Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment” below for additional information.

Under the Lands’ End, Inc. the 2017 Stock Plan, following a Change in Control (as defined in the 2017 Stock Plan) involving the Company, any non-vested portion of a participant’s award will fully vest in the event that either (1) the surviving, continuing, successor, or purchasing entity fails to assume or continue our rights and

obligations under such award or fails to provide the participant with a substantially equivalent award, or (2) the participant’s employment is terminated within 18 months following the Change in Control on account of a termination by the Company (or any acquiring entity) for any reason other than Cause or on account of a participant’s resignation for Good Reason (each as defined in the 2017 Stock Plan). This type of treatment of equity following a Change in Control is referred to as a “double trigger” change-in-control provision and is intended to provide the participant with reasonable assurance regarding previously awarded compensation in the event of a Change in Control and subsequent termination of employment.

Our Competitive Pay Practices

The Committee believes that, in order to retain valuable executives and attract qualified candidates, we must offer executive compensation arrangements that include components that are set at levels that candidates would view favorably when considering alternative employment opportunities. In making compensation decisions, we takestake many factors into account, including competitive considerations; the responsibilities, impact and importance of the individual’s position within the Company; individual performance; the individual’s expected future contributions to the Company; the individual’s historical compensation; the performance of the Company overall; retention risk; tenure in position;experience; internal pay equity; and the effect on our general and administrative expenses. The Committee also takes into account compensation and market data, which data primarily focuses on apparel retail companies and other related industries.

In connection with the actions taken by the Compensation Committee in fiscal year 20212023, for the named executive officers, the Compensation Committee reviewed publicly available compensation data of a peer group of companies that was determined with assistance from Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”), the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant, supplemented by survey data, when relevant public data were not available. The Compensation Committee used available information and monitored actions taken by the peer group companies to evaluate market trends and to assess the long-term incentive design aspects and overall competitiveness of our executive compensation programs. While the Compensation Committee diddoes not seek to establish any specific
28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

element of compensation or total compensation at or within a prescribed range relative to theits peer group of companies, it generally considers compensation arrangements to be competitive if they fall within a range of 15% above or below a market median.

In making its fiscal year 2021 compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee considered compensation data from the 17 peer companies set forth below (the “2021 Peer Group”), comprised primarily of apparel retail companies and those in related industries. In comparing the relative size of the Company to the peer group median, our revenue was at approximately the median and market capitalization was at approximately the 25th percentile.

2021 Peer Group
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.Express, Inc.
The Buckle, Inc.Francesca’s Holdings Corporation
Carter’s, Inc.G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
The Cato Corp.Oxford Industries, Inc.
Chico’s FAS, Inc.Shoe Carnival, Inc.
The Children’s Place Retail Stores, Inc.Tilly’s, Inc.
Columbia Sportswear CompanyUrban Outfitters, Inc.
Deckers Outdoor CorporationZumiez, Inc.
Duluth Holdings, Inc.

The Committee typically reviews the composition of its peer group annually.annually, prior to compensation determinations. The Committee believes that limited year-over-year change allows the Company to use a peer group that provides familiar market information and facilitates managing compensation levels and program design on a multi-year basis.
Following a peer group

review that was undertaken in September 2020 for setting 2021 compensation,2022, and at the recommendation of FW Cook, the 2021 Peer Group for fiscal year 2023 remained substantially consistent with the prior peer group used for setting fiscal year 2020 compensation,by the Company, with the removaladdition of twothree peer companies, RTW Retailwinds, Inc.Caleres, Citi Trends and Tailored Brands, Inc., eachGenesco, which were added due to their size, relevant business overlap and commonality of peers, and the deletion of Francesca’s, which had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy during 2020.

protection.

In making its fiscal year 2023 compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee considered compensation data from the 19 peer companies set forth below (the “Peer Group”), comprised primarily of apparel retail companies and those in related industries. In comparing the relative size of the Company to the peer group median, our revenue was between the 25th percentile and the median and market capitalization was at approximately the 25th percentile.
Peer Group
American Eagle Outfitters, Inc.
​​
Duluth Holdings, Inc.
The Buckle, Inc.
​​
Express, Inc.
Caleres, Inc.
​​
G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
Carter’s, Inc.
​​
Genesco Inc.
The Cato Corp.
​​
Oxford Industries, Inc.
Chico’s FAS, Inc.
​​
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
The Children’s Place Retail Stores, Inc.
​​
Tilly’s, Inc.
Citi Trends, Inc.
​​
Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Columbia Sportswear Company
​​
Zumiez, Inc.
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
​​
At our 20212023 annual meeting of stockholders, approximately 94%91% of the votes cast supported our advisory resolution on the compensation of our executive officers named in the proxy statement for the meeting. The Compensation Committee reviewed these results and viewed them as an indicator of stockholder support for the compensation program and did not make any changes to the compensation program design for fiscal year 20212023 in response to the stockholder vote outcome.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

As equity compensation has becomeis an increasingly important part of our compensation philosophy, during fiscal year 2018 the Compensation Committee adoptedsets stock ownership guidelines, to ensurewhich require our senior executives accumulate and hold a meaningful level of Lands’ End stock, in order to establish commonality of interest with stockholders and to be alignedalign with best governance practices. The guidelines became effective July 31, 2018.2018, and were updated September 13, 2021. The guidelines provide for the Chief Executive Officer to hold an amount of stock equal in value to four times base salary, the President to hold an amount of stock equal to three times base salary (which requirement was adopted during fiscal year 2021, following Mr. Gooch’s promotion to the role of President), Executive Vice PresidentsPresident level employees to hold an amount of stock equal in value to two times base salary, and Senior Vice PresidentsPresident level employees to hold an amount of stock equal in value to one times base salary. There is no prescribed time frame by which to accumulate the stock, however, until the guideline is met, executives are required to retain 50% of net after taxafter-tax shares realized upon the vesting of equity awards. Directly and indirectly beneficially owned shares are counted toward meeting the requirement. Any unvested or unearned restricted stock units and unexercised stock options are not counted toward meeting the requirement.
29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation Risk Assessment

We conduct an annual compensation risk assessment, and have concluded that our compensation policies and practices were not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us or our business. In reaching this determination, we reviewed our compensation plans, the types of awards, the risks associated with the plan designs and opportunity for metric manipulation. Factor mitigating risks identified, included:

appropriate target pay philosophy, peer group and market positioning to support business objectives;

effective balance in salary and variable compensation, shorter- and longer-term performance focus and use of both cash and equity;

effective Compensation Committee oversight and ability to use discretion to reduce incentives earned;

appropriate incentive performance/payout curves, with goals that can be attained without taking inappropriate risks of deviating from normal operations or approved strategies;

caps on incentive pay opportunities;

robust stock ownership guidelines;

clawback, anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies; and

appropriate and market competitive severance provisions.

Clawback Policy and Executive Compensation Recovery Provisions

We have adopted and maintain a Clawback Policy that applies to all employees at the Senior Vice President level and above. Per the policy, erroneously paid incentive-based compensation made to executives on or after October 2, 2023 is subject to recovery by the Company, in the event of an error relating to certain accounting restatements. If there is a restatement, and under the restated results, incentive-based compensation that was previously paid, otherwise would not have been paid (i.e. because performance goals, as restated, were not met), then the excess amounts paid in error are subject to recovery by the Company. In accordance with the policy, Lands’ End may not indemnify or reimburse any clawback amounts, and executives have acknowledged waiver of indemnification rights in connection with clawbacks. Our AIP, the Long-Term Incentive Program (as Amended and Restated), the 2014 Stock Plan (as Amended and Restated) and the 2017 Stock Plan also contain executive compensation recovery provisions. The relevant

provisions provide that we may seekand permit reimbursement from participating executives, if our financial statements or approved financial measures are subject to restatement due to error or misconduct, to the extent required by the policy and as permitted by applicable law.

Accounting Treatment and Deductibility of Executive Compensation

In reviewing our compensation programs, the Compensation Committee considers both the accounting treatment and the tax deductibility of compensation. However, in order to attract, retain, and motivate senior executives it is likely that we will pay compensation that is not tax deductible or may create an adverse accounting charge. Our Compensation Committee will continue to structure our compensation program in the best long-term interests of our stockholders, with the accounting treatment and the tax deductibility of compensation being among a variety of considerations taken into account.

Compensation Committee Role in Executive Compensation Decisions

The Compensation Committee is appointed by the Board to fulfill the Board’s responsibilities relating to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and our other senior executives reporting to the CEO, and equity awards for other Section 16 officers. The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating all compensation plans and our policies and programs as they affect our senior executives. For additional information regarding the role of our Compensation Committee, see “Corporate Governance—Committees of the Board—Compensation Committee.” In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee may retain compensation consultants to assist in structuring and evaluating executive compensation. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate all compensation consultants and has the sole authority to approve the consultant’s fees and the terms and conditions of the consultant’s retention. The Compensation Committee also has authority to obtain advice and assistance from internal and external legal, accounting, and other advisors.
30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Role of Consultants, Advisors, and Management in Executive Compensation Decisions

The Compensation Committee has retained FW Cook as its independent compensation consultant. FW Cook reports directly to the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain or dismiss the consultant.

FW Cook assists the Compensation Committee and works on its behalf on matters related to the Compensation Committee’s purposes and responsibilities as set forth in the Compensation Committee charter.Charter. FW Cook periodically advises the Compensation Committee as to trends in executive compensation and also provides specialized studies or advice as requested with respect to executive compensation issues. In fiscal year 2021,2023, FW Cook provided an update of compensation trends and regulatory developments, analyzed our use of various compensation elements, provided assistance with the review and design of our incentive compensation programs, assessed the competitiveness of our executive compensation levels, reviewed non-employee director compensation for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and assisted inwith the preparation of our public filings with regard to executive compensation. Representatives of FW Cook attend Compensation Committee meetings in person or by telephonevirtually as requested, and during fiscal year 2021,2023, regularly attended Compensation Committee meetings.

The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of FW Cook, including reviewing information received from FW Cook that addressed factors relevant to SEC and the Nasdaq Stock Market listing rules regarding conflicts of interest and independence and considers FW Cook to be independent under the applicable standards.

The Compensation Committee also received advice and considered the recommendations of Mr. GriffithMcLean in fiscal year 20212023 regarding the forms and the amounts of compensation for our employees, including the other named executive officers, and of Mr. Griffith, Mr. Gooch,McCracken, Mr. Gray and our Senior Vice President, Employee Services,Chief Human Resources Officer, regarding our compensation programs generally. No member of management was present during any Compensation Committee deliberations or voting with respect to his or hertheir specific compensation.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with management of the Company. Based on the review and discussions,discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2022February 2, 2024, and in this Proxy Statement.

Compensation Committee

Robert Galvin, Chair


Elizabeth Leykum


Josephine Linden

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal year 2021,2023, none of the members of the Compensation Committee was or is a current or former officer or employee of the Company. No executive officer of the Company served or serves on the compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) or on the board of directors of any company that employed or employs any member of the Compensation Committee or any entity that has or has had one or more executive officers who served on our Board during fiscal year 2021.2023.
31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the total compensation paid to our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer during fiscal year 2021,2023, our other executive officers for fiscal year 2023 who were executive officers at the end of the fiscal year and ourone additional individual who would have been one of the three other most highly compensated executive officers but for fiscal year 2021 who werethe fact she was not serving as an executive officersofficer at the end of the fiscal year (collectively, the “named executive officers”).

Name and Principal Position

  Year   Salary($)
(a)		   Stock
Awards($)
(b)		   Non Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)
(c)		   All Other
Compensation ($)
(d)		   Total ($) 

Jerome Griffith
Chief Executive Officer

   2021   $1,050,000   $2,519,993   $1,858,500   $15,105   $5,443,598 
   2020   $827,885   $853,153   $1,480,500   $5,001   $3,166,539 
   2019   $1,019,231   $2,309,982   $2,076,734   $8,631   $5,414,578 

James Gooch
President and Chief Financial
Officer

   2021   $698,462   $938,214   $927,208   $10,742   $2,574,625 
   2020   $636,192   $256,678   $734,963   $1,604   $1,629,437 
   2019   $688,846   $674,974   $888,132   $8,423   $2,260,375 

Peter L. Gray

   2021   $583,846   $626,973   $775,056   $9,912   $1,995,787 

Executive Vice President, Chief

   2020   $521,769   $210,515   $602,775   $2,631   $1,337,690 

Administrative Officer and General Counsel

   2019   $564,769   $552,972   $701,282   $8,439   $1,827,462 

Chieh Tsai

   2021   $510,385   $549,942   $677,536   $8,029   $1,745,891 

Chief Product Officer

   2020   $457,692   $184,659   $528,750   $2,308   $1,173,409 
   2019   $500,000   $499,994   $493,250   $8,631   $1,501,875 

Sarah Rasmusen(e)

Chief Customer Officer

   2021   $442,308   $467,460   $587,163   $6,000   $1,502,931 

Fiscal year 2023 included 53 weeks, and accordingly all figures reflect amounts that are slightly higher than would have been the case in a 52-week year, on which basis “annual” compensation is determined. Total compensation for the 2021 and 2022 fiscal years is provided only if such person was a named executive officer in either of those years.
Name and Principal
Position
​​
Year
​​
Salary
($)
​​
Bonus
($)(a)
​​
Stock
Awards
($)(b)
​​
Option
Awards
($)(b)
​​
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(c)
​​
All Other
Compensation
($)(d)
​​
Total
($)
Andrew J. McLean
Chief Executive
Officer(e)
​​
2023
​​
$1,070,192
​​
—
​​
$2,697,031
​​
—
​​
$834,750
​​
$26,687
​​
$4,628,661
​
2022
​​
$258,462
​​
$600,000
​​
$1,249,993
​​
$1,249,995
​​
—
​​
$20,081
​​
$3,378,530
Bernard McCracken
Chief Financial
Officer(e)
​​
2023
​​
$529,122
​​
—
​​
$169,748
​​
—
​​
$309,536
​​
$9,088
​​
$1,017,494
Peter L. Gray
Chief Commercial Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel(e)
​​
2023
​​
$687,981
​​
—
​​
$794,650
​​
—
​​
$402,468
​​
$20,657
​​
$1,905,756
​
2022
​​
$607,430
​​
—
​​
$648,988
​​
—
​​
$162,450
​​
$9,367
​​
$1,428,235
​
2021
​​
$583,846
​​
—
​​
$626,973
​​
—
​​
$775,056
​​
$9,912
​​
$1,995,787
Angela Rieger
Executive Vice President, Chief Transformation
Officer(e)
​​
2023
​​
$460,577
​​
—
​​
$529,773
​​
—
​​
$269,187
​​
$19,611
​​
$1,279,398
Sarah Rasmusen
Former Executive Vice President, Chief Innovation Officer(e)
​​
2023
​​
$282,628
​​
—
​​
$545,658
​​
—
​​
$0
​​
$247,809
​​
$1,076,095
​
2022
​​
$459,346
​​
—
​​
$494,981
​​
—
​​
$121,125
​​
$6,395
​​
$1,081,847
​
2021
​​
$442,308
​​
—
​​
$467,460
​​
—
​​
$587,163
​​
$6,000
​​
$1,502,931
(a)

Fiscal year 2020 amounts reflect the impact2022 bonus amount for Mr. McLean represents a lump sum cash bonus make-whole payment of temporary voluntary pay reductions taken by the named executive officers as a result$600,000 in connection with commencement of the COVID-19 pandemic.

employment.
(b)

The amounts shown in the “Stock Awards” columnand “Option Awards” columns represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the equity awards, computed in accordance with ASC 718, and not the actual amounts that might be paid to or realized by the named executed officers. ASC 718 fair value amount asThe vesting of the grant date for restricted stock units generally is spread over the number of months of service required for the grant to vest. The vestingoptions awards and for restricted stock units is discussed in the footnotes to the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” and “Outstanding Equity Awards at 20212023 Fiscal Year End” tables below. For the 20212023 restricted stock awards,units, fair value for the time-based awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date, March 19, 2021,June 14, 2023 ($8.54), and fair value for the performance-based awards is calculated at the target payout level as of the grant date.date and a grant date fair value of $9.74 per share (the award date closing price as adjusted to reflect the estimated value of the Relative TSR modifier; calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation, described in Note 5. Stock-Based Compensation in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2024). For fiscal years 2021, 2022 and 2023, the stock awards consisted of an equal number of time-based restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units, except for Mr. McLean’s fiscal year 2022 stock awards, which were entirely time-based restricted stock units in accordance with the terms of his employment letter. For the 20212023 performance-based restricted stock unit awards, the maximum grant date potential values are as follows: Griffith, $2,519,993; Gooch, $938,214;Mr. McLean, $2,458,960; Mr. McCracken, $180,891; Mr. Gray, $626,973; Tsai, $549,942;$846,815; Ms. Rieger, $564,550; and Ms. Rasmusen, $467,460. For fiscal years 2019 and 2021, 50% of the stock awards was in the form of time-based restricted stock units and 50% was in the form of performance-based restricted stock units. The lower stock award value for fiscal year 2020 is a result of the Compensation Committee’s decisions to use (i) performance-based cash awards, rather than performance-based equity awards, as part of long-term incentives in fiscal year 2020, and (ii) a thirty trading-day average price ($9.26) instead of the closing price on the date of the award ($6.84), when computing the number of restricted stock unit awarded, in order to preserve share availability under our stock plan, and reduce future stockholder dilution, given market volatility at the time of the awards.

$581,478.
(c)

Fiscal year 20202023 and fiscal year 2021 amounts represent incentive payment earned pursuant to our Annual Incentive Plan. Fiscal year 20192022 amounts represent incentive payment earned pursuant to the 2020 Long-Term Incentive Program. No payment was made in fiscal year 2022 pursuant to our Annual Incentive Plan and 2017 Long Term Incentive Program.

Plan.
(d)

Fiscal year 20212023 amounts representfor (i) Mr. McLean includes $4,361 relocation expenses, $12,629 temporary corporate housing and $6,668 of travel reimbursement all in their entiretyaccordance with the terms of his employment arrangements, and $3,029 for 401(k) match, other thanmatch; (ii) Mr. Griffith’s amount, whichMcCracken consists of $9,088 for 401(k) match; (iii) Mr. Gray consists of $20,657 for 401(k) match; (iv) Ms. Rieger includes $17,637 for 401(k) match and $2,770 for$1,666 executive physical examination benefit.

benefit; and (vi) Ms. Rasmusen includes $196,379 in salary continuation payments made pursuant to the terms of her severance agreement, $20,002 in payment of her unused vacation, $15,606 for 401(k) match, $8,097 in health benefits continuation, and $7,725 of outplacement services.
(e)

Officer titles listed are as of fiscal year end 2023. During fiscal year 2023, Mr. McCracken served as Interim Chief Financial Officer until September 2023, when he was appointed Chief Financial Officer, Ms. RasmusenRieger became an executive officer in March 2021.

2023, and on September 5, 2023, the employment of Sarah Rasmusen, Executive Vice President, Chief Innovation Officer, ceased in connection with a position elimination by the Company.
32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth the awards granted to our named executive officers in fiscal year 20212023 under our incentive plans.

Name

 Plan
or
Award		 Grant
Date for
Equity-
Based
Award		  Approval
Date for
Equity-
Based
Award		  

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive  Plan
Awards

  Estimated Future Payouts under
Equity-Incentive Plan
Awards(d)		  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)(e)		  Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Options
Awards
($)(f)		 
 Threshold
($)		  Target
($)		  Maximum
($)		  Threshold
(#)		  Target
(#)		  Maximum
(#)		 

Jerome Griffith

 (a)   $525,000  $1,050,000  $2,100,000      
 (b)  3/19/2021   3/10/2021      21,035   42,070   84,140   $1,259,997 
 (c)  3/19/2021   3/10/2021         42,070  $1,259,997 

James Gooch

 (a)   $261,923  $523,846  $1,047,692      
 (b)  3/19/2021   3/10/2021      7,832   15,663   31,326   $469,107 
 (c)  3/19/2021   3/10/2021         15,663  $469,107 

Peter L. Gray

 (a)   $218,942  $437,885  $875,769      
 (b)  3/19/2021   3/10/2021      5,234   10,467   20,934   $313,487 
 (c)  3/19/2021   3/10/2021         10,467  $313,487 

Chieh Tsai

 (a)   $191,394  $382,788  $765,577      
 (b)  3/19/2021   3/10/2021      4,591   9,181   18,362   $274,971 
 (c)  3/19/2021   3/10/2021         9,181  $274,971 

Sarah Rasmusen

 (a)   $165,865  $331,731  $663,462      
 (b)  3/19/2021   3/10/2021      3,902   7,804   15,608   $233,730 
 (c)  3/19/2021   3/10/2021         7,804  $233,730 

 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-
Equity Incentive Plan Awards
​​
Estimated Future Payouts under Equity-
Incentive Plan Awards(d)(e)
​​
 
​​
 
Name
​​
Plan or
Award
​​
Grant
Date for
Equity-
Based
Award
​​
Approval
Date for
Equity-
Based
Award
​​
Threshold
($)
​​
Target
($)
​​
Stretch
Target
($)
​​
Maximum
($)
​​
Threshold
(#)
​​
Target
(#)
​​
Maximum
(#)
​​
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)(e)(f)
​​
Grant Date
Fair Value of
Stock and
Options
Awards
($)(g)
Andrew J. McLean
​​
(a)
​​
 
​​
 
​​
$535,096
​​
$802,644
​​
1,070,192
​​
$2,140,385
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​
(b)
​​
6/14/2023
​​
6/7/2023
​​
​​
​​
​​
​​
73,770
​​
147,540
​​
252,460
​​
​​
$1,437,040
​
(c)
​​
6/14/2023
​​
6/7/2023
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
147,540
​​
$1,259,992
Bernard McCracken
​​
(a)
​​
 
​​
 
​​
$198,421
​​
$297,631
​​
$396,842
​​
$793,683
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​
(b)
​​
6/14/2023
​​
6/7/2023
​​
​​
​​
​​
​​
4,463
​​
9,286
​​
18,572
​​
​​
$90,446
​
(c)
​​
6/14/2023
​​
6/7/2023
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
9,286
​​
$79,302
Peter L. Gray
​​
(a)
​​
 
​​
 
​​
$257,993
​​
$386,989
​​
$515,985
​​
$1,031,971
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​
(b)
​​
6/14/2023
​​
6/7/2023
​​
​​
​​
​​
​​
21,736
​​
43,471
​​
86,942
​​
​​
$423,408
​
(c)
​​
6/14/2023
​​
6/7/2023
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
43,471
​​
$371,242
Angela Rieger
​​
(a)
​​
 
​​
 
​​
$172,716
​​
$259,074
​​
$345,433
​​
$690,865
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​
(b)
​​
6/14/2023
​​
6/7/2023
​​
​​
​​
​​
​​
14,491
​​
28,981
​​
57,962
​​
​​
$282,275
​
(c)
​​
6/14/2023
​​
6/7/2023
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
28,981
​​
$247,498
Sarah
Rasmusen(h)
​​
(a)
​​
 
​​
 
​​
$179,629
​​
$269,443
​​
$359,257
​​
$718,514
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​
(b)
​​
6/14/2023
​​
6/7/2023
​​
​​
​​
​​
​​
14,925
​​
29,850
​​
59,700
​​
​​
$290,739
​
(c)
​​
6/14/2023
​​
6/7/2023
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
29,850
​​
$254,919
(a)

Awards under our Annual Incentive Plan.Plan, which provided for 50% payout for reaching the threshold, 75% payout for reaching the target, 100% payout for reaching the stretch target and 200% at maximum. Performance yielded a 78% payout at 177% of target and actual cash amounts earned under the plan are included in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for further discussion of the plan design and performance criteria.
(b)

Award of performance-based restricted stock units under the 2017 Stock Plan.

(c)

Awards of time-based restricted stock units under the 2017 Stock Plan.

(d)

The amounts shown reflect number of restricted stock units which may vest following the conclusion of the three-year performance period of fiscal years 2021, 20222023, 2024 and 2023,2025, based on the satisfaction of cumulative performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee and the recipient maintaining a continuous business relationship with the Company though the performance period and on the payment date. The threshold achievement represents 50% of target, and maximum achievement represents 200% of target. Performance below the threshold level results in the restricted stock units expiring with no vesting. The restricted stock units may also vest, to a certain extent, under certain circumstances. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment” below. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for further discussion of the performance-based restricted stock units and performance criteria.

(e)

TheIssuances pursuant to each performance-based restricted stock unit award and restricted stock unit award are subject to the terms of the 2017 Stock Plan, including the per participant limit set forth in Section 7.1(b) of the Plan.

(f)
Restricted stock units vest as to 25%, 25% and 50% on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant, provided that the executive maintains a continuous business relationship on each such date, and may also vest, to a certain extent, under certain circumstances. See “—Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment” below.

(f)(g)

The Grant Date Value of Stock Awards represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the equity awards, computed in accordance with ASC 718, and not the actual amounts that might be paid to or realized by the named executive officers. The grant date fair value for each restricted stock unit is the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant.grant ($8.54), and the grant date fair value for the performance-based awards is $9.74 per share (the award date closing price as adjusted to reflect the estimated value of the Relative TSR modifier; calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation, described in Note 5. Stock-Based Compensation in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2024). For performance-based restricted stock unit awards, target level is used to compute value.

(h)
Ms. Rasmusen’s fiscal year 2023 awards were forfeited upon termination of her employment September 5, 2024.
33

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Outstanding Equity Awards at 20212023 Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth information regarding the outstanding equity awards held by the named executive officers as of January 28, 2022,February 2, 2024, the last trading day of fiscal year 2021.

Name

 Option Awards  Stock Awards 
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable		  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
(a)		  Option
Exercise
Price
($)		  Option
Expiration
Date		  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#) (b)		  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That
Have Not
Vested ($)		  Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested (#)		  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout
Value of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested ($)		 

Jerome Griffith

  294,118   —    $18.10   3/6/2027   36,714  $665,625   146,852(c)  $2,662,427 
      93,548  $1,696,025   84,140(d)  $1,525,458 
      42,070  $762,729   

James Gooch

  —     —     —      10,729  $194,517   42,910(c)  $777,958 
      28,145  $510,269   31,326(d)  $567,940 
      15,663  $283,970   

Peter L. Gray

  49,017   —    $22.00   5/8/2027   8,789  $159,345   35,154(c)  $637,342 
      23,083  $418,495   20,934(d)  $379,533 
      10,467  $189,767   

Chieh Tsai

  —     —     —      7,947  $144,079   31,786(c)  $576,280 
      20,248  $367,096   18,362(d)  $332,903 
      9,181  $166,452   

Sarah Rasmusen

  —     —     —      4,173  $75,656   16,686(c)  $302,517 
      17,211  $312,035   15,608(d)  $282,973 
      7,804  $141,487   

2023.
 
​​
Option Awards
​​
Stock Awards
Name
​​
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable(a)
​​
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable(a)
​​
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
​​
Option
Expiration
Date
​​
Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
(#)(b)
​​
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
($)(c)
​​
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)
​​
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
($)(c)
Andrew J. McLean
​​
42,020
​​
126,061
​​
$10.81
​​
11/1/2032
​​
86,725
​​
$805,675
​​
147,540(f)
​​
$1,370,647
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
147,540
​​
$1,370,647
​​
 
​​
 
Bernard McCracken
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
1,252
​​
$11,631
​​
2,504(d)
​​
$23,262
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
2,796
​​
$25,975
​​
3,728(e)
​​
$34,633
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
9,286
​​
$86,267
​​
9,286(f)
​​
$86,267
Peter L. Gray
​​
49,017
​​
—
​​
$22.00
​​
5/8/2027
​​
5,234
​​
$48,624
​​
10,467(d)
​​
$97,238
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
11,786
​​
$109,492
​​
15,714(e)
​​
$145,983
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
43,471
​​
$403,846
​​
43,471(f)
​​
$403,846
Angela Rieger
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
3,013
​​
$27,991
​​
6,026(d)
​​
$55,982
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
6,810
​​
$63,265
​​
9,079(e)
​​
$84,344
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
28,981
​​
$269,233
​​
28,981(f)
​​
$269,233
Sarah Rasmusen*
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
*
All unvested equity awards held by Ms. Rasmusen were forfeited when her employment with the Company ceased on September 5, 2023.
(a)

TheseRepresent time-based stock options. Mr. McLean’s stock options were granted November 1, 2022, with vesting of 25%, 25%, 50% per year, respectively, on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to his continued employment. Mr. Gray’s stock options are fully vested.

(b)

These time-based RSUs will vest as follows, subject in each case to the satisfaction of vesting conditions, including as applicable, continued employment or a continuous business relationship with the Company:

   Vesting Date and Number of RSUs Vesting   TOTAL 
  3/19/2022   3/25/2022   3/19/2023   3/19/2024 

Jerome Griffith

          

3/25/19 Award:

     36,714        36,714 

3/19/20 Award:

   31,182      62,366      93,548 

3/19/21 Award:

   10,517      10,518    21,035    42,070 

James Gooch

          

3/25/19 Award:

     10,729        10,729 

3/19/20 Award:

   9,381      18,764      28,145 

3/19/21 Award:

   3,915      3,916    7,832    15,663 

Peter L. Gray

          

3/25/19 Award:

     8,789        8,789 

3/19/20 Award:

   7,694      15,389      23,083 

3/19/21 Award:

   2,616      2,617    5,234    10,467 

Chieh Tsai

          

3/25/19 Award:

     7,947        7,947 

3/19/20 Award:

   6,749      13,499      20,248 

3/19/21 Award:

   2,295      2,295    4,591    9,181 

Sarah Rasmusen

          

3/25/19 Award:

     4,173        4,173 

3/19/20 Award:

   5,737      11,474      17,211 

3/19/21 Award:

   1,951      1,951    3,902    7,804 
 
​​
Vesting Date and Number of RSUs Vesting
​​
 
 
​​
3/18/2024
​​
3/19/2024
​​
6/14/2024
​​
11/1/2024
​​
3/18/2025
​​
6/14/2025
​​
11/1/2025
​​
6/14/2026
​​
TOTAL
McLean
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
11/1/22 Grant:
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
28,908
​​
 
​​
 
​​
57,817
​​
 
​​
86,725
6/14/23 Grant:
​​
 
​​
 
​​
36,885
​​
 
​​
 
​​
36,885
​​
 
​​
73,770
​​
147,540
McCracken
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
3/19/21 Grant:
​​
 
​​
1,252
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
1,252
3/18/22 Grant:
​​
932
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
1,864
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
2,796
6/14/23 Grant:
​​
 
​​
 
​​
2,321
​​
 
​​
 
​​
2,322
​​
 
​​
4,643
​​
9,286
Gray
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
3/19/21 Grant:
​​
 
​​
5,234
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
5,234
3/18/22 Grant:
​​
3,929
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
7,857
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
11,786
6/14/23 Grant:
​​
 
​​
 
​​
10,867
​​
 
​​
 
​​
10,868
​​
 
​​
21,736
​​
43,471
Rieger
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
3/19/21 Grant:
​​
 
​​
3,013
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
3,013
3/18/22 Grant:
​​
2,270
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
4,540
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
6,810
6/14/23 Grant:
​​
 
​​
 
​​
7,245
​​
 
​​
 
​​
7,245
​​
 
​​
14,491
​​
28,981
(c)

Based on a February 2, 2024 closing price of $9.29 per share.

(d)
These performance-based RSUs (shown at maximumtarget level of performance, per Instruction 3performance) were eligible to Item 402(f)(2)) vest based on achievement of fiscal year 2019 through fiscal year 2021 cumulative performance goals. Of the target number

of these performance-based RSUs (referred to elsewhere in this Proxy Statement as the 2019 PRSU Awards) 118% vested based on Company financial performance from fiscal year 2019 through fiscal year 2021, upon and subject to certification of performance measures by the Compensation Committee on March 24, 2022. Accordingly, the number of shares issued to each of the named executive officers was as follows:

Name

Number of Shares
Issued Upon Vesting of
2019 PRSU Awards

Jerome Griffith

86,642

James Gooch

25,316

Peter L. Gray

20,740

Chieh Tsai

18,753

Sarah Rasmusen

9,844
(d)

These performance-based RSUs (shown at maximum level of performance, per Instruction 3 to Item 402(f)(2)) vest based on achievement of fiscal year 2021 through fiscal year 2023 cumulative performance goals.

No shares were earned and the awards expired unvested. See Prior Performance-Based Awards Providing Fiscal Year 2023 Compensation Opportunity - 2021 PRSU Awards.
(e)
These performance-based RSUs (shown at target level of performance) vest based on achievement of fiscal year 2022 through fiscal year 2024 cumulative performance goals.
(f)
These performance-based RSUs (shown at target level of performance) vest based on achievement of fiscal year 2023 through fiscal year 2025 cumulative performance goals.
34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

None of our named executive officers exercised any stock options during fiscal year 2021.2023. The following table provides information for each of our named executive officers regarding vesting of RSU awards during fiscal year 2021.

                 Name                

  

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#)(a)(c)

   

    Value Realized on    
Vesting ($)(b)(c)

 

Jerome Griffith

   155,771   $4,234,927 

James Gooch

   38,269   $1,015,058 

Peter L. Gray

   36,151   $947,101 

Chieh Tsai

   20,922   $562,390 

Sarah Rasmusen

   16,367   $441,959 

2023.
Name
​​
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)(a)
​​
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(b)
Andrew McLean
​​
28,908
​​
$176,628
Bernard McCracken
​​
5,609
​​
$48,630
Peter L. Gray
​​
21,934
​​
$190,168
Angela Rieger
​​
13,522
​​
$117,236
Sarah Rasmusen
​​
16,421
​​
$142,370
(a)

The numbers shown include RSUs withheld by the Company to satisfy tax obligations associated with vesting.

vesting and reflects the vesting of time-based restricted stock units awarded in 2020, 2021 and 2022.
(b)

Represents the fair market value of the shares of stock based on closing price on the vesting date.

(c)

Totals do not reflect the vesting of the 2019 PRSU Awards, in connection with Company performance from fiscal year 2019 through fiscal year 2021. Vesting of these shares occurred upon certification of satisfaction of the performance measures by the Compensation Committee on March 24, 2022 and resulted in the share issuances and value realized on the vesting date, based on closing price on the vesting date, as follows:

                 Name                

  

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#)

   

    Value Realized on    

Vesting ($)

 

Jerome Griffith

   86,642   $1,589,014 

James Gooch

   25,316   $464,295 

Peter L. Gray

   20,740   $380,372 

Chieh Tsai

   18,753   $343,930 

Sarah Rasmusen

   9,844   $180,539 

Employment Arrangements

Certain components of the compensation paid to our named executive officers reflected in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table are based on our named executive officers’ employment letters or arrangements that provide for their employment with Lands’ End. Set forth below are summary descriptions of the key terms of compensation for each named executive officer that impactedrelating to their compensation in fiscal year 2021.2023. For a discussion of the severance payments and other benefits payable in connection with a qualifying termination of employment under each named executive officer’s executive severance agreement, see “—Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment” below and also “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.

Jerome Griffith

Andrew J. McLean

Mr. Griffith’sMcLean’s employment letter providesarrangements with the Company provide him with the following current relevant compensation: (1) a minimum annual base salary of $950,000 (which has been increased over time to $1,050,000);$1,050,000; (2) aan annual target bonus opportunity under the AIP equal to 100% of his annual base salary; (3) aan annual target long-term incentive award opportunity equal to at least 200% of his annual base salary;$2,520,000; (4) an inducement a sign-on grant of 117,647 RSUs115,633 restricted stock units (the ““McLean sign-on RSUs” RSU”), and an inducement a sign-on grant of options to purchase 294,118168,081 shares of ourCompany common stock (the “sign-on stock options”) with an exercise price equal to $18.10,$10.81 per share, the fair market valueclosing price of a share of Company common stock on the grant date March 6, 2017. On March 6, 2021,(and Mr. Griffith’s McLean’s start date), November 1, 2022 (the “McLean sign-on stock optionsoption” and together with the McLean sign-on RSUs became fully vested. Mr. Griffith’s long-term incentive opportunity has been increased from time RSU, the “McLean sign-on awards”), in each case which vest 25%, 25%, 50% per year, respectively, on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to time. In fiscal year 2021,his continued employment; provided that on his earlier termination by the Company increasedwithout cause or his resignation with good reason, any portion of the McLean sign-on awards that would have become vested within the 12 months following the date of separation from service will become immediately vested, and in the event of termination due to death or disability, 50% of the sign-on RSU and 100% of the sign-on stock option, respectively, that is not then vested, shall become vested; (5) a lump sum cash bonus make-whole payment of $600,000; and (6) through April 30, 2023, he received temporary corporate housing in the Madison, Wisconsin area and reimbursement of airfare between Wisconsin and his residences in New York and Maine, as well as reimbursement of certain legal fees. Mr. Griffith’s long-term incentive opportunityMcLean’s primary workplace location is Dodgeville, Wisconsin and he maintains a residence in Wisconsin. Mr. McLean received the sign-on awards and cash sign-on award to 240% ofreplace amounts forfeited when leaving his annual base salary.

James Gooch

prior employment.

Bernard McCracken
Mr. Gooch’sMcCracken’s employment letter, as amended, provides Mr. Goocharrangements with the Company provide him with the following current relevant compensation: (1) a minimuman annual base salary of $625,000 (which has been increased over time to $700,000);$525,000; (2) a target bonus opportunity under the AIP equal to 75% of his annual base salary; and (3) a target long-term incentive opportunity, equalwhich for future awards is expected to at least 100%be 110% of his annual base salary. salary (previously 50%).
35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Peter L. Gray
Mr. Gooch’s primary workplace location is Dodgeville, Wisconsin and he is eligible to receive relocation benefits pursuant to the Company’s relocation policy. In fiscal year 2021,Gray’s arrangements with the Company increased Mr. Gooch’s long-term incentive opportunity to 135% of his annual base salary.

Peter L. Gray

Mr. Gray’s employment letter provides Mr. Grayprovide him with the following current relevant compensation: (1) an initial annual base salary of $500,000 (which has been increased over time to $590,000);$675,000; (2) a target bonus opportunity under the AIP equal to 75% of his annual base salary; and (3) a target long-term incentive opportunity equal to 100% of his annual base salary; and (4) a sign-on grant of RSUs with a grant date value equal to $500,000 (the “sign-on RSUs”) and a sign-on grant of options to purchase shares of our common stock with a grant date value equal to $500,000 (the “sign-on stock options”) with an exercise price equal to $22.00, the fair market value of a share of Company common stock on the grant date, May 8, 2017. On May 8, 2021, Mr. Gray’s sign-on stock options and sign-on RSUs became fully vested. In fiscal year 2021, the Company increased Mr. Gray’s long-term incentive opportunity to 110% of his annual base salary.

Chieh Tsai

Angela Rieger
Ms. Tsai was promoted to her current role as Chief Product Officer ofRieger's employment arrangement with the Company on January 7, 2019. Per a letter agreement dated January 3, 2019, Ms. Tsai is providedprovide her with the following current relevant compensation: (1) an annual base salary of $500,000, (which has been increased over time to $515,000), (2) a target bonus opportunity under the AIP equal to 75% of her annual base salary; and (3) a target long-term incentive opportunity equal to 100% of her annual base salary. In fiscal year 2021, the Company increased Ms. Tsai’s long-term incentive opportunity to 110% of her annual base salary.

Sarah Rasmusen

Ms. Rasmusen, our former Chief Innovation Officer, served the Company from November 2017 to September 5, 2023. Prior to her departure, Ms. Rasmusen was promoted to the role of Chief Customer Officer in June 2019 and promoted to Executive Vice President in March 2021. Per a letter agreement dated September 4, 2019, Ms. Rasmusen is provided with the following current relevant compensation: (1) an annual base salary of $425,000 (which has been increased over time to $450,000),$472,770, (2) a target bonus opportunity under the AIP equal to 75% of her annual base salary; and (3) a target long-term incentive opportunity increasing from 75% of her annual base salary to 100% of her annual base salary (effective beginning fiscal year 2020). In fiscal year 2021, the Company increased Ms. Rasmusen’s long-term incentive opportunity to 110% of her annual base salary.

Ms. Rasmusen’s employment ceased on September 5, 2023, in connection with a position elimination by the Company. In connection with her departure, Ms. Rasmusen is eligible to receive payments and benefits under and subject to her executive severance agreement with the Company, specifically, (1) salary continuation for up to 12 months, (2) continued health insurance coverage for up to 12 months, (3) 12 months of outplacement services, and (4) a lump sum payment equal to unused vacation pay.

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment

As described under “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Other Compensation Elements—Severance Benefits” above, the Company is party to severance agreements with each of the named executive officers. The following is a discussion of the potential compensation and benefits that the named executive officers would be entitled to upon termination of employment.

Ms. Rasmusen’s employment ceased September 5, 2023; see “— Employment Arrangements —Sarah Rasmusen” above for details concerning the compensation and benefits that Ms. Rasmusen received in connection with her departure from the Company.

For purposes of the severance agreements (except as noted) the following definitions apply:
Good Reason:

A termination by the executive officer is for “Good Reason” generally if it results from (1) a reduction of more than 10% in the sum of the executive officer’s annual base salary and target AIP award from those in effect as of the date of the severance agreement;award; (2) an executive officer’s mandatory relocation to an office more than 50 miles from the primary location at which the executive officer is required to perform his or hertheir duties; or
(3) any action or inaction that constitutes a material breach under the severance agreement, including the failure of a successor company to assume or fulfill the obligations under the severance agreement. Under Mr. Griffith’s, Mr. Gooch’sMcLean’s and Mr. Gray’s agreements, material diminution in their duties also constitutes a Good Reason, and under Mr. Griffith’sMcLean’s agreement, a Good Reason further includes (i) no longer being the principal executive officer of the Company and (ii) if at any time that ESL Investments, Inc. and its affiliate entities beneficially own more than twenty percent (20%) of our shares entitled to vote for directors, and they, in whole or in part, vote against Mr. Griffith’sMcLean’s reelection to the Board while he is serving as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

Cause:

“Cause” generally is defined as (1) a material breach by the executive officer, other than due to incapacity due to a disability, of the executive officer’s duties and responsibilities which breach is demonstrably willful and deliberate on the executive officer’s part, is committed in bad faith or without reasonable belief that such breach is in the best interests of the Company (or its affiliates) and such breach is not remedied by the executive officer in a reasonable period of time after receipt of written notice from the Company specifying such breach; (2) the commission by the executive officer of a felony (in certain cases defined as a felony involving moral turpitude); or (3) dishonesty or willful misconduct in connection with the executive officer’s employment.

Severance Benefits upon Termination without Cause or for Good Reason

Subject to his or hertheir execution of a release of claims against the Company and its affiliates, if the executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason, the executive will be entitled to receive, subject to the terms of the applicable agreement, 12 months of base salary at the rate
36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

in effect as of the date of termination, other than for Mr. Griffith,McLean, who is entitled to a payment equal to two times the sum of his base salary plus his average bonus paid for the most recent prior two completed fiscal years (“Average Bonus”), paid in installments over 24 months, and Mr. Gooch and Mr. Gray each of whomwho is entitled to a payment equal to his base salary plus his Average Bonus payable over 12 months. In the event the termination occurs in contemplation of or within two years after a Change in Control of the Company, Mr.��Griffith’s McLean’s severance payment is increased to two and one half times the sum of his base salary plus Average Bonus (as defined in the Executive Severance Agreement), paid in installments over 30 months, and each of Mr. Gooch and Mr. Gray is entitled to receive an amount equal to two times the sum of his base salary plus Average Bonus over a period of 24 months.

Mr. McLean and Mr. Gray are each entitled to continued health insurance coverage for up to the same period of time as severance is paid. If termination of employment occurs during the last six months of the applicable fiscal year, Mr. McLean and Mr. Gray are also entitled to a pro-rata bonus for that fiscal year, based on actual performance.

The executives are entitled to receive continuation of the active medical and dental coverage that the named executive officer was eligible to participate in prior to the end of employment during the salary continuation period, provided that if the executive becomes eligible to participate in another medical or dental benefit plan through another employer or spousal plan during such period, the executive will be required to pay the full premium applicable to continuation coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA).

The executives also are entitled to reasonable outplacement services, mutually agreed to by the Company and the named executive officer, for a period of up to 12 months or until subsequent employment is obtained, whichever occurs first.

All

Per their severance agreements, the named executive officers are entitled to a lump sum payment of unused vacation pay benefits granted to the named executive officer prior to his or hertheir termination date.

Other Terms of Severance Agreements

An eligible named executive officer will not be entitled to a severance payment under the severance agreements in the event of termination for Cause or voluntary termination.

Under the severance agreements, the named executive officers agree to, and payments under the agreements are subject to, non-disclosure of confidential information (two years), non-disparagement (two years),non-solicitation (18 months) and non-compete (generally 12 months, where permissible under applicable state law, and subject to waiver by the Company; 24 months in the case of Mr. Griffith)McLean) covenants, as well as a release of liability for certain claims against the Company.

The severance agreements do not provide for payments to the participating named executive officers upon termination of employment due to death, disability or retirement. Our incentive programs and/or award agreements thereunder provide for eligibility to receive payments or vesting of awards upon the death or disability of named executive officers (and in certain cases, upon termination of employment by the Company without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason) as provided below.

Named executive officers are not entitled to any “golden parachute” excise tax gross-up payments under any plan or agreement with the Company.

Payments Pursuant to Incentive Compensation Programs

As described under “—Compensation, Discussion and Analysis” above, the Company provides annual and long-term incentive awards to our named executive officers. Payments under these programs for termination of employment are treated as described below.

Annual Incentive Plan. Generally, if a participant in the AIP voluntarily terminates employment (for any reason other than disability) or is involuntarily terminated for any reason (other than death) prior to the payment date for an AIP award, he or she will forfeit his or hertheir AIP award. In the event of death or disability, the named executive officer will be entitled to a pro rata payment through the termination date if the financial criteria under the AIP are satisfied. In the case of each of Mr. Griffith, Mr. GoochMcLean and Mr. Gray, per each individual’s Executive Severance Agreement, in the event his employment is terminated without Cause or he terminates his employment for Good Reason, within the last six months of a fiscal year, he will be entitled to a pro rata bonus that would otherwise be payable under the AIP for such fiscal year based on actual results for the fiscal year.
37

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Performance Cash Awards. If any named executive officer voluntarily terminated employment (for any reason other than disability) or was involuntary terminated for any reason (other than death), he or she would forfeit his or her Performance Cash Awards, which were made pursuant to the Company’s Long-Term Incentive Program (as Amended and Restated) (the “LTIP”), except as prohibited by law. Under the LTIP, in the event of death or disability, he or she would be entitled to a pro rata payment through the termination date if performance under the award, as of the termination date, equaled or exceeded the applicable performance targets and the named executive officer was a participant in the LTIP for at least 12 months of the performance period.

2017 Stock Plan Awards. Generally, if any named executive officer voluntarily terminates employment (for any reason other than disability) or is involuntary terminated for any reason (other than death) he or she will forfeit any unvested awards made under the 2017 Stock Plan .Plan. Following the 12-month anniversary of the grant date of his or hertheir award, if any named executive officer’s employment is terminated because of (1) death, the unvested portion of his or hertheir award will vest on a pro rata basis through the date of death, payable in cash to his

or hertheir estate, or (2) disability, the unvested portion of his or hertheir award will vest on a pro rata basis through the date of termination.

Provisions in Equity Awards. Under the terms of the grant agreements governing Mr. McLean’s sign-on RSUs and sign-on stock options, in the event of termination due to death or disability, 50% of any then unvested sign-on RSUs will vest and 100% of any unvested sign-on stock options will vest.
Change in Control Provisions of the 2017 Stock Plan. The 2017 Stock Plan, which govern the RSUequity awards discussed above, provide that, except to the extent specified in the applicable award agreement, upon a change in control involving the Company, any non-vested portion of a named executive officer’s award will fully vest in the event that either (1) the surviving, continuing, successor, or purchasing entity fails to assume or continue our rights and obligations under such award or fails to provide the participant with a substantially equivalent award, or (2) the participant’s employment is terminated within 18 months following the change in control on account of a termination by the Company (or any acquiring entity) for any reason other than Cause or on account of a named executive officer’s resignation for Good Reason.

Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment

The table below summarizes the potential payouts to the named executive officers for(other than Ms. Rasmusen, whose employment ceased September 5, 2023) in the event of certain termination events described above.events. The amounts shown in the following table assume that the termination of employment occurred on January 28, 2022.February 2, 2024. The actual amounts that would be paid to the named executive officers can only be determined at the time of such executive’s separation.
 
​​
Severance
Pay(a)
​​
Bonus
Payment(b)
​​
Continuation
Medical/
Welfare
Benefits(c)
​​
Vacation(d)
​​
Outplacement
​​
Accelerated
Vesting(e)
​​
Total
Andrew McLean
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
Termination for Good Reason
​​
$4,200,000
​​
$1,050,000
​​
$42,064
​​
$80,769
​​
$7,725
​​
$268,555
​​
$5,649,113
Termination without Cause
​​
$4,200,000
​​
$1,050,000
​​
$42,064
​​
$80,769
​​
$7,725
​​
$268,555
​​
$5,649,113
Termination with Cause
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
Voluntary Termination
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
Termination due to Disability
​​
—
​​
$1,050,000
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
$402,838
​​
$1,452,838
Retirement
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
Termination due to Death
​​
—
​​
$1,050,000
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
$402,838
​​
$1,452,838
Termination after Change in Control
​​
$5,250,000
​​
$1,050,000
​​
$52,579
​​
$80,769
​​
$7,725
​​
$3,546,968
​​
$9,988,042
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
Bernard McCracken
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
Termination for Good Reason
​​
$525,000
​​
 
​​
$15,204
​​
$40,358
​​
$7,725
​​
—
​​
$588,314
Termination without Cause
​​
$525,000
​​
 
​​
$15,204
​​
$40,358
​​
$7,725
​​
—
​​
$588,314
Termination with Cause
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
Voluntary Termination
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
Termination due to Disability
​​
—
​​
$​393,750
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
$67,956
​​
$461,706
Retirement
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
Termination due to Death
​​
—
​​
$​393,750
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
$67,956
​​
$461,706
Termination after Change in Control
​​
$525,000
​​
—
​​
$15,204
​​
$40,358
​​
$7,725
​​
$268,035
​​
$856,349
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
Peter L. Gray
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
Termination for Good Reason
​​
$876,234
​​
$506,250
​​
$21,032
​​
$51,923
​​
$7,725
​​
—
​​
$1,463,164
Termination without Cause
​​
$876,234
​​
$506,250
​​
$21,032
​​
$51,923
​​
$7,725
​​
—
​​
$1,463,164
Termination with Cause
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
Voluntary Termination
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
Termination due to Disability
​​
—
​​
$506,250
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
$258,361
​​
$791,611
38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  Severance
Pay(a)		  Bonus
Payment(b)		  LTIP
Payout(c)		  Continuation
Medical/
Welfare
Benefits(d)		  Vacation(e)  Outplacement  Accelerated
Vesting(f)		  Total 

Jerome Griffith

        

Termination for Good Reason

 $4,691,462  $1,050,000   —    $27,872  $80,769  $8,000   —    $5,858,103 

Termination without Cause

 $4,691,462  $1,050,000   —    $27,872  $80,769  $8,000   —    $5,858,103 

Termination with Cause

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Voluntary Termination

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Termination due to Disability

  —    $1,050,000  $770,000   —     —     —    $2,626,547  $4,446,547 

Retirement

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Termination due to Death

  —    $1,050,000  $770,000   —     —     —    $2,626,547  $4,446,547 
Termination after Change in Control $5,864,328  $1,050,000   —    $34,840  $80,769  $8,000  $5,218,322  $12,256,258 

James Gooch

        

Termination for Good Reason

 $1,349,048  $525,000   —    $19,569  $53,846  $8,000   —    $1,955,463 

Termination without Cause

 $1,349,048  $525,000   —    $19,569  $53,846  $8,000   —    $1,955,463 

Termination with Cause

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Voluntary Termination

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Termination due to Disability

  —    $525,000  $231,667   —     —     —    $773,807  $1,530,473 

Retirement

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Termination due to Death

  —    $525,000  $231,667   —     —     —    $773,807  $1,530,473 
Termination after Change in Control $2,698,095  $525,000   —    $19,569  $53,846  $8,000  $1,661,705  $4,966,215 

Peter L. Gray

        

Termination for Good Reason

 $1,122,237  $442,500   —    $19,569  $45,385  $8,000   —    $1,637,691 

Termination without Cause

 $1,122,237  $442,500   —    $19,569  $45,385  $8,000   —    $1,637,691 

Termination with Cause

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Voluntary Termination

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Termination due to Disability

  —    $442,500  $190,000   —     —     —    $634,133  $1,266,633 

Retirement

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Termination due to Death

  —    $442,500  $190,000   —     —     —    $634,133  $1,266,633 
Termination after Change in Control $2,244,474  $442,500   —    $39,138  $45,385  $8,000  $1,276,044  $4,055,541 

Chieh Tsai

        

Termination for Good Reason

 $515,000   —     —    $13,738  $39,615  $8,000   —    $576,353 

Termination without Cause

 $515,000   —     —    $13,738  $39,615  $8,000   —    $576,353 

Termination with Cause

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Voluntary Termination

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Termination due to Disability

  —    $386,250  $166,667   —     —     —    $568,502  $1,121,419 

Retirement

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Termination due to Death

  —    $386,250  $166,667   —     —     —    $568,502  $1,121,419 
Termination after Change in Control $515,000   —     —    $13,738  $39,615  $8,000  $1,132,219  $1,708,572 

Sarah Rasmusen

        

Termination for Good Reason

 $450,000   —     —    $18,341  $34,615  $8,000   —    $510,956 

Termination without Cause

 $450,000   —     —    $18,341  $34,615  $8,000   —    $510,956 

Termination with Cause

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Voluntary Termination

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Termination due to Disability

  —    $337,500  $141,667   —     —     —    $349,927  $829,094 

Retirement

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Termination due to Death

  —    $337,500  $141,667   —     —     —    $349,927  $829,094 
Termination after Change in Control $450,000   —     —    $18,341  $34,615  $8,000  $821,924  $1,332,880 

 
​​
Severance
Pay(a)
​​
Bonus
Payment(b)
​​
Continuation
Medical/
Welfare
Benefits(c)
​​
Vacation(d)
​​
Outplacement
​​
Accelerated
Vesting(e)
​​
Total
Retirement
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
Termination due to Death
​​
—
​​
$506,250
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
$258,361
​​
$791,611
Termination after Change in Control
​​
$1,752,468
​​
$506,250
​​
$42,064
​​
$51,923
​​
$7,725
​​
$1,209,028
​​
$3,569,458
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
Angela Rieger
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
Termination for Good Reason
​​
$500,000
​​
 
​​
$19,852
​​
$48,077
​​
$7,725
​​
—
​​
$575,654
Termination without Cause
​​
$500,000
​​
 
​​
$19,852
​​
$48,077
​​
$7,725
​​
—
​​
$575,654
Termination with Cause
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
Voluntary Termination
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
Termination due to Disability
​​
—
​​
$375,000
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
$164,582
​​
$539,582
Retirement
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
Termination due to Death
​​
—
​​
$375,000
​​
—
​​
—
​​
—
​​
$164,582
​​
$539,582
Termination after Change in Control
​​
$500,000
​​
 
​​
$19,852
​​
$48,077
​​
$7,725
​​
$770,048
​​
$1,345,702
(a)

These amounts represent salary continuation and bonus payments (as applicable), without reduction by the amount of fees, salary, wages or any other form of compensation that the officer may earn from a subsequent employer or through self-employment during the salary continuation period, where applicable.

(b)

Represents pro rata bonus, assuming full payment and termination at conclusion of performance period.

(c)

Represents pro rata payout of Performance Cash Awards, in accordance with the terms of the Long-Term Incentive Program.

(d)(c)

TheseWhere applicable, these amounts represent the continuation of the health and welfare benefits in which each named executive officer was enrolled on January 28, 2022,February 2, 2024, assuming that the officer continues to participate in these plans for the duration of the severance period.

(e)(d)

Assumes executive has not used any vacation time during year and represents maximum payout.

(f)(e)

The amounts shown are based on the value of $18.13$9.29 per share, the closing price of our Common Stock on January 28, 2022.February 2, 2024. The amounts shown represent the acceleration of equity awards outstanding on January 28, 2022February 2, 2024 in accordance with applicable agreements or compensation plans. For Termination after Change in Control this also assumes the named executive officer’s employment was terminated by the Company (or any acquiring entity) on January 28, 2022February 2, 2024, within 18 months following a “Change in Control” (as defined in the 2017 Stock Plan) for any reason other than Cause or on account of the officer’s resignation for Good Reason.

CEO

Chief Executive Officer Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the median annual total compensation of our employees (other than our CEO)the then Chief Executive Officer) and the annual total compensation of our CEO, Jerome Griffith, Chief Executive Officer:

Officer during fiscal year 2023.

For fiscal year 2021:

2023:

the median of the annual total compensation of our employees (other than our CEO)(as defined above) was $26,817; the median employee was a US-based part-time employee whose total compensation includes base wages, fiscal year 2021 bonus and a 401(k) matching payment; and

$30,293;

○the median employee was a US-based full-time employee whose total compensation includes base wages, a discretionary bonus, and a 401(k) matching payment; and

the total annual compensation of the CEOChief Executive Officer for purposes of determining the CEOChief Executive Officer pay ratio was $5,443,598; Mr. Griffith’s total annual compensation includes his base wages, stock awards, fiscal year 2021 bonus payment, executive physical examination benefit, and a matching 401(k) payment.

$4,628,661;

○Mr. McLean’s total annual compensation includes his base wages, stock awards, non-equity incentive plan compensation, and other compensation, as shown on the Summary Compensation Table.

Based on this information, for fiscal year 2021,2023, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Griffith, our CEO,Chief Executive Officer, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was estimated to be 203153 to 1.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates
39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates that we used were as follows:

We determined that, as of January 28, 2022,27, 2024, our employee population for purposes of determining our median employee consisted of approximately 4,8814,291 individuals globally:

○4,041 employees in the United States, and
○250 employees in the United Kingdom.

4,011 employees in the United States,

410 employees in the United Kingdom,

270 employees in Germany, and

190 employees in Japan.

In determining our employee population as of such date, we excluded less than 5% of our total global workforce (68(217 employees, comprised of 5718 employees in Hong Kong, and 119 employees in France)France and 190 employees in Germany) from the identification of the “median employee,” as permitted by the de minimis exemption under SEC rules.

Though under SEC rules we may have used the same median employee identified in our last Proxy Statement, we identified a new median employee for fiscal year 2021.

2023.

We selected January 28, 2022,27, 2024, as the date upon which we would identify the “median employee”. We picked January 28, 2022,27, 2024, as the date to identify the median employee because it was within the last three months of our fiscal year and because the disparate impact of seasonal employees on this determination would be minimized.

To identify the “median employee” from our employee population, we collected all taxable compensation, including base wages, overtime and any other compensation paid during fiscal year 2021.2023. Excluded from the employee population for purposes of determining the median employee include the CEOChief Executive Officer and employees on a leave of absence on January 28, 2022.27, 2024.

40

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Pay Versus Performance
The following table shows the total compensation for our named executive officers for the past four fiscal years as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table, the “compensation actually paid” to our Principal Executive Officer (PEO) and, on an average basis, our other named executive officers (in each case, as determined under SEC rules), our Total Shareholder Return (TSR), the TSR of the S&P 600 Apparel Retail Index over the same period, our net income, and our financial performance measure for compensatory purposes, Adjusted EBITDA.
This disclosure has been prepared in accordance with Item 402(v) and does not necessarily reflect value actually realized by the executives or how the Compensation Committee evaluates compensation decisions in light of Company or individual performance. In particular, the Compensation Committee has not used compensation actually paid (CAP) as a basis for making compensation decisions, nor does it use GAAP Net Income for purposes of determining incentive compensation. Please refer to our Compensation Discussion and Analysis above for a discussion of our executive compensation program objectives and the ways in which we align executive compensation pay with performance.
Pay Versus Performance Table
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
 
​​
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
​​
 
​​
 
Fiscal
Year(1)
(a)
​​
Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for PEO(2)
(b)
​​
Compensation
Actually Paid
to PEO(3)
(c)
​​
Average Summary
Compensation
Table Total
for Non-PEO Named
Executive Officers(2)
(d)
​​
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid
to Non-PEO
Named Executive
Officers(3)
(e)
​​
Total
Shareholder
Return(4)
(f)
​​
Peer Group
Total
Shareholder
Return(4)
(g)
​​
Net Income
(In Thousands)
(h)
​​
Adjusted
EBITDA(5)
(In Thousands)
(i)
2023
​​
$4,628,661
​​
$4,516,435
​​
$1,319,686
​​
$1,150,570
​​
$79.74
​​
$202.72
​​
($130,684)
​​
$84,301
2022
​​
$4,278,798
​​
$128,735
​​
$1,765,652
​​
$769,839
​​
$77.34
​​
$141.18
​​
($12,530)
​​
$70,497
2021
​​
$5,443,598
​​
$3,489,364
​​
$1,954,809
​​
$1,443,938
​​
$155.62
​​
$149.06
​​
$33,369
​​
$120,882
2020
​​
$3,166,539
​​
$10,118,578
​​
$1,239,640
​​
$2,604,468
​​
$237.00
​​
$115.10
​​
$10,836
​​
$86,956
(1)
Mr. McLean served as Principal Executive Officer (PEO) the entirety of fiscal year 2023. Mr. Griffith served as Principal Executive Officer (PEO) the entirety of fiscal year 2020, 2021 and 2022, and our other named executive officers for the applicable fiscal years were as follows: 2020: James Gooch, Peter L. Gray, Chieh Tsai and Kelly Ritchie; 2021: James Gooch, Peter L. Gray, Sarah Rasmusen and Chieh Tsai; 2022: James Gooch, Andrew J. McLean, Peter L. Gray, Sarah Rasmusen and Chieh Tsai; and 2023: Bernard McCracken, Peter L. Gray, Angela Rieger and Sarah Rasmusen.
(2)
Amounts reported in this column represent (i) for PEO, the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year for Mr. McLean or Mr. Griffith as applicable, and (ii) for Non-PEOs, the average of the total compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for our other named executive officers reported for the applicable year.
(3)
SEC rules require certain adjustments be made to the Summary Compensation Table totals to determine “compensation actually paid” as reported in the Pay Versus Performance Table. “Compensation actually paid” does not necessarily represent cash and/or equity value transferred to the applicable named executive officer without restriction, but rather is a value calculated under applicable SEC rules. In general, “compensation actually paid” is calculated as Summary Compensation Table total compensation, adjusted to include the fair market value of equity awards as of the last day of the applicable fiscal year or, if earlier, the vesting date (rather than the grant date). The named executive officers do not participate in a defined benefit plan so no adjustment for pension benefits is included. Similarly, no adjustment is made for dividends, as dividends have not been paid. The valuation assumptions and processes used to recalculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant. The following tables detail the adjustments:
 
​​
FY2023
 
​​
PEO
Compensation
​​
Non-PEO Named
Executive Officer
Compensation
(Averages)
Total Compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table
​​
$ 4,628,661
​​
$1,319,686
(Deduct): Fair value of equity compensation granted during the covered fiscal year as reported in the Summary Compensation Table
​​
($2,697,031)
​​
($  509,957)
Add: Fair value at year end of equity compensation granted in the covered fiscal year that was outstanding and unvested at the covered fiscal year end
​​
$ 2,690,244
​​
$   372,603
Add or (Deduct): The change in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that were outstanding and unvested as of the end of the covered fiscal year
​​
$      60,065
​​
$       2,162
41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
​​
FY2023
 
​​
PEO
Compensation
​​
Non-PEO Named
Executive Officer
Compensation
(Averages)
Add: Fair value as of the vesting date of awards granted and vested during the covered fiscal year
​​
$              0
​​
$              0
Add or (Deduct): For awards granted in prior years for which all applicable vesting conditions were satisfied at the end of or during the covered fiscal year, the change in the fair value from the end of the prior fiscal year to the vesting date
​​
($165,504)
​​
($      4,886)
Deduct: For awards granted in prior years that failed to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the covered fiscal year (i.e., were forfeited), the amount equal to the fair value at the end of the prior fiscal year
​​
$              0
​​
($    29,037)
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO / non-PEO Named Executive Officers
​​
$4,516,435
​​
$1,150,570
(4)
TSR is determined based on the value of an initial fixed investment of $100. The TSR peer group consists of the S&P 600 Apparel Retail Index.
(5)
The Company’s most important financial performance measure is Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is not a generally accepted accounting principle (“GAAP”); a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Net (loss) income is shown in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations— Net Income (Loss) and Adjusted EBITDA in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal years 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023.
42

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Relationship Between “Compensation Actually Paid” and Performance Measures
We believe the pay versus performance table shows the alignment between compensation actually paid to the named executive officers and the Company’s performance, consistent with our compensation philosophy as described in “—Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above. The charts below show, for the past four fiscal years, the relationship between the PEO and non-PEO “compensation actually paid” and each of (i) TSR and Peer TSR; (ii) the Company’s Net Income; and (iii) the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA.

 
2023 Performance Measures
As described in greater detail in “—Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above, our approach to executive compensation is designed to reward our named executive officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term financial goals, while minimizing excessive risk taking in the short term, and to motivate and encourage executives to drive performance and achieve superior results for the Company and its stockholders. The financial measures used by the Company to link compensation actually paid (as defined by SEC rules) to the Company’s named executive officers for the most recently completed fiscal year to the company’s performance are:
​​
Important Performance Measures
​​
Adjusted EBITDA
​​
Revenue
​​
Relative Total Stockholder Return (Relative TSR)
43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 2. ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act, we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules.

As described in detail under the heading “—Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this Proxy Statement, we seek to link a significant portion of the compensation of our named executive officers with the Company’s performance. Our compensation programs are designed to reward our named executive officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term financial goals, while minimizing excessive risk taking in the short term. We believe that our compensation program is strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. We urge you to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement for additional details on our executive compensation programs, including our compensation philosophy and objectives and the compensation of our named executive officers during fiscal year 2021.

2023.

The vote on this proposal is not intended to address any specific element of compensation; rather, the vote relates to the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. The vote is advisory and is not binding on the Company, our Board, or the Compensation Committee of the Board. However, the Board and Compensation Committee value the opinions expressed by our stockholders in their voting on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the voting when making future compensation decisions and policies regarding our named executive officers.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON A NON-BINDING ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS
DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT
44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 3. ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF HOLDING FUTURE VOTES REGARDING THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
We are providing our stockholders with the opportunity to vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, for their preference as to how frequently we should seek future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, which we refer to as an “advisory vote on executive compensation”. By voting with respect to this Item 3, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer that we conduct future advisory votes on executive compensation once every one, two, or three years. Stockholders also may, if they wish, abstain from casting a vote on this proposal.
Our Board has determined that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will allow our stockholders to provide timely, direct input on the Company’s executive compensation philosophy, policies, and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement each year. The Board believes that an annual vote is therefore consistent with the Company’s efforts to engage in a dialogue with our stockholders on executive compensation and corporate governance matters. We currently hold a stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation annually.
The Company recognizes that the stockholders may have different views as to the best approach for the Company, and therefore we look forward to hearing from our stockholders as to their preferences on the frequency of an advisory vote on executive compensation.
This vote is advisory and not binding on the Company or our Board in any way.
The proxy card provides stockholders with the opportunity to choose among four options (holding the vote every one, two or three years, or abstaining) and, therefore, stockholders will not be voting to approve or disapprove the recommendation of the Board.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU CHOOSE “1 YEAR” AND VOTE TO HOLD AN
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION EVERY YEAR
45

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ITEM 3.4. RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Item 34 is the ratification of the Audit Committee’s appointment of BDO USA,Deloitte & Touche LLP (“BDO”Deloitte”) as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ending January 27, 2023.31, 2025 (“Fiscal Year 2024”). Representatives of BDODeloitte will be present at the Annual Meeting. TheyMeeting, and will be available to respond to your questions and may make a statement if they so desire. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLPBDO USA, P.C. (“Deloitte”BDO”), the Company’s former independent registered public accounting firm, will not be present at the Annual Meeting and will not be available to respond to your questions or make a statement.

Recent changes in accounting firm

The Audit Committee recently completed a process to determine which audit firm would serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, beginning with the fiscal year ending January 27, 2023. Deloitte, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2022 (“Fiscal 2021”) was invited to participate and participated in the process. Deloitte has served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm since 2012.

On March 14, 2022,April 4, 2024, the Company, with the approval of the Audit Committee, notified DeloitteBDO that DeloitteBDO was being dismissed as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, effective withimmediately, and the Company appointed Deloitte as its independent registered public accounting firm for its fiscal year ending January 31, 2025. Deloitte previously served as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm from 2012 through the conclusion of the audit for Fiscal 2021. The audit was completed, and Deloitte’s audit report was included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2021, on March 24,fiscal year ended January 28, 2022.

During the Company’s fiscal years ended January 29, 202127, 2023 and January 28, 2022February 2, 2024 and through the date on which the Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2021,April 4, 2024, the Company has not had any disagreement with DeloitteBDO on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreement, if not resolved to Deloitte’sBDO’s satisfaction, would have caused DeloitteBDO to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in their reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, during the Company’s fiscal years ended January 29, 202127, 2023 and January 28, 2022February 2, 2024 and through March 24, 2022, the date on which the Company filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2021,April 4, 2024, there were no “reportable events” as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K. Deloitte’s BDO reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended January 29, 202127, 2023 and January 28, 2022February 2, 2024 did not contain any adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, nor were they qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.

The Fiscal 2023 audit was completed, and BDO’s audit report for the fiscal year ended January 29, 2021was included an explanatory paragraph regardingin the Company’s adoption of ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) as of February 2, 2019 using the modified retrospective method.

Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal 2023, filed April 3, 2024.

The Company provided DeloitteBDO with a copy of these auditor change disclosures prior to filing the disclosures inits April 4, 2024 Current Report on Form 8-K Amendment No. 1 filed (the “8-K”) with the SEC on March 30, 2022Securities and Exchange Commission (the “8-K”“SEC”) and requested that DeloitteBDO furnish it with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with the above statements in Item 4.01(a). Deloitte of the 8-K. BDO confirmed they agreed with the statements made in Item 4.01(a) of the 8-K. A copy of Deloitte’sBDO’s letter, dated March 30, 2022,April 8, 2024, was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the 8-K.

On March 14, 2022, the Audit Committee approved the appointment of BDO as the Company’s new independent registered public accounting firm commencing for its quarter ending April 29, 2022 and its fiscal year ending January 27, 2023.

In connection with the Company’s appointment of BDODeloitte as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and during the Company’s two most recent fiscal years ended January 27, 2023 and February 2, 2024 and through April 4, 2024, the Company did not consult BDODeloitte on any matter relating to either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or contemplated, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements or (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions) or a “reportable event” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

The following table shows the fees paid or accrued by the Company and its subsidiaries for the audit and other services provided by DeloitteBDO and itstheir affiliates for each of the past two fiscal years.

   Fiscal Year 2020   Fiscal Year 2021 

Audit Fees(1)

  $1,012,166   $ 1,042,174 

Audit-Related Fees

   —      —   

Tax Fees(2)

  $25,000   $6,715 

All Other Fees

   —      —   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,037,166   $1,048,889 

years (“Fiscal 2022 and 2023”).
 
​​
Fiscal Year 2022
​​
Fiscal Year 2023
Audit Fees(1)
​​
$1,259,259
​​
$1,119,985
Audit-Related Fees
​​
—
​​
—
Tax Fees(2)
​​
$7,712
​​
$3,380
All Other Fees(3)
​​
$8,000
​​
—
Total
​​
$1,274,971
​​
$1,123,365
(1)

Audit Fees representRepresents fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, review of interim financial statements, statutory audits, and other SEC matters.

46

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(2)
All Tax Fees are for compliance services related to Hong Kong tax filings.
(2)(3)

Tax Fees include fees and expensesBDO was not the principal accountant in fiscal year 2021, but performed services in connection with the audit of consulting services related to the Company’s long-term debt refinancing401(k) plan; in Fiscal Year 20202022 the 401(k) audit work was performed by another auditor and Hong Kong tax filingswe paid BDO $8,000 in Fiscal Year 2021.

connection with the transition of the 401(k) audit work.

The Audit Committee must pre-approve all engagements of our independent registered public accounting firm, as required by its charter and the rules of the SEC. For each fiscal year, the Audit Committee approves an annual estimate of fees for engagements, taking into account whether the services are permissible under applicable law and the possible impact of each non-audit service on the independent registered public accounting firm’s independence from management. In addition, the Audit Committee evaluates known potential engagements of the independent registered public accounting firm, including the scope of the proposed work to be performed and the proposed fees, and approves or rejects each service. Management may present additional services for approval at subsequent committee meetings. The Audit Committee has delegated to the Audit Committee Chair the authority to evaluate and approve engagements with related fees of up to $100,000 on behalf of the Audit Committee in the event a need arises for pre-approval between Committee meetings. If the Audit Committee Chair so approves any such engagements, he reports that approval to the full Audit Committee at its next meeting.

All of the Fiscal Year 2020 (“Fiscal 2020”)2022 and Fiscal 20212023 audit and other services provided by Deloitte, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited and their respective affiliates,BDO were pre-approved in accordance with the Audit Committee’s policies and procedures.

BDO was not the principal accountant in Fiscal 2020 or Fiscal 2021, but we paid BDO $18,500 during Fiscal 2021 and $19,000 during Fiscal 2020, for services in connection with the audit of the Company’s 401(k) plan.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSAL TO RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF BDO USA,DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR
FISCAL YEAR 20222024
47

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report of the Audit Committee

The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing the Company’s system of internal controls, the presentation and disclosure in the Company’s financial statements, which will be provided to our stockholders and others, and the overall audit process. All members of the Audit Committee meet the criteria for independence applicable to audit committee members under the Nasdaq listing rules. The Audit Committee Charter complies with the Nasdaq listing rules.

Management is responsible for the financial reporting process, including its internal control over financial reporting, and for the preparation of its consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and expressing opinions on (i) the conformity of the financial statements with GAAP; and (ii) the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and review these processes, acting in an oversight capacity, and the Audit Committee does not certify the financial statements or guarantee the independent registered public accounting firm’s report. The Audit Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to it, including representations made by management and the independent registered public accounting firm, including its audit report.

The Audit Committee discussed with Deloitte,BDO, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2021,2023, the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from DeloitteBDO required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte’sBDO’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with DeloitteBDO its independence. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and DeloitteBDO the audited consolidated financial statements of Lands’ End, Inc. for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2022.February 2, 2024. Based on the review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited consolidated financial statements of Lands’ End, Inc. be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2022.February 2, 2024.
Audit Committee
John T. McClain, Chair
Robert Galvin
Josephine Linden
Jignesh Patel
48

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Audit Committee

John T. McClain, Chair

Robert Galvin

Josephine Linden

Jignesh Patel

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS

Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons

The Company’s Audit Committee Charter requires that the Audit Committee review and approve all related- party transactions required to be disclosed pursuant to SEC rules. With respect to each related-party transaction, the Audit Committee will take into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms that are no less favorable to the Company than terms generally available from an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction.

The Board has adopted a written Related Party Transactions Approval Policy that governs the Audit Committee’s practices with respect to related party transactions. In evaluating any related party transaction, the Audit Committee takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms that are no less favorable to the Company or its subsidiaries than would be obtained in a comparable arm’s-length transaction and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction.

Since January 29, 2021,27, 2023, there has been no transaction in which Lands’ End was or is to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

OTHER INFORMATION

Other Business That May Come Before the Meeting

Our management does not intend to bring any other business before the Annual Meeting for action and has not been notified of any other business proposed to be brought before the Annual Meeting. However, if any other business should be properly presented for action, it is the intention of the persons named on the proxy card to vote in accordance with their judgment on such business.

2023

2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Procedures for Submitting Stockholder Proposals

If you would like to include a stockholder proposal in the proxy statement for our 20232025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, your stockholder proposal must satisfy the rules and regulations of the SEC to be eligible for inclusion in the proxy statement for that meeting and it must be delivered to the Company not later than December 1, 2022.11, 2024. However, if the date of our 20232025 Annual Meeting changes by more than 30 days from the date that is the first anniversary of our 20222024 Annual Meeting, then the deadline is a reasonable time before we begin to print and mail proxy materials for the 20232025 Annual Meeting. If you would like to submit a stockholder proposal for our 20232025 annual meeting of stockholders (“20232025 Annual Meeting”) and you do not require that the proposal be included in the Company’s proxy materials, you must notify the Company of such proposal not later than the close of business on the 90th day, and not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day, prior to the first anniversary of the date of the 20222024 Annual Meeting. However, if the date of the 20232025 Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before, or more than 70 days after, the anniversary date, you must notify the Company of such proposal not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the 20232025 Annual Meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to the Annual Meeting or the 10th day following the day on which the Company first makes a public announcement of the date of the 20232025 Annual Meeting. Your notice must also include the information required by and otherwise comply with our Bylaws.

All stockholder proposals must be delivered to the Company at the following address: Lands’ End, Inc., 1 Lands’ End Lane, Dodgeville, Wisconsin 53595, Attention: General Counsel and Secretary.
49

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers and the beneficial holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with respect to our common stock with the SEC and to furnish copies of these reports to Lands’ End. Based on a review of these reports and written representations from our directors and executive officers that no other reports were required, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were met on a timely basis during fiscal year 2023 except for one Form 4 reporting one transaction for Robert Galvin, a director, due January 31, 2023 but filed on February 1, 2023 due to a clerical error.
Solicitation of Proxies

The proxies are solicited by our Board of Directors. We will pay the cost to solicit proxies. Directors and officers of the Company and employees of its affiliates may solicit proxies either personally or by telephone, facsimile transmission or through the Internet.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2022,February 2, 2024, including the financial statements and schedules and a list of all exhibits, will be supplied without charge to any stockholder upon written request sent to Lands’ End, Inc., Legal Department, 1 Lands’ End Lane, Dodgeville, Wisconsin 53595, Attn: General Counsel and Secretary. You may also view the Annual Report on Form 10-K on-line at the SEC website at www.sec.gov or on our website at www.landsend.com under the heading Investor Relations and the subheading Financials & Filings.

No Incorporation by Reference

We include website addresses throughout this Proxy Statement for reference only. The information contained in these websites is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

IMPORTANT

The interest and cooperation of all stockholders in the affairs of Lands’ End are considered to be of the greatest importance by Lands’ End. Even if you expect to attend the Annual Meeting, it is requested that, whether your share holdings are large or small, you promptly vote by telephone, through the Internet or by mail (if you received your proxy materials by mail).

50

LOGO

LANDS’ END, INC.
1 LANDS’ END LANE
DODGEVILLE, WISCONSIN 53595
SCAN TO
VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on 05/10/2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERYTABLE OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on 05/10/2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
For Withhold For All To withhold authority to vote for any All All Except individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: nominee(s) on the line below.
1. Election of Directors
Nominees
01) Robert Galvin 02) Jerome Griffith 03) Elizabeth Leykum 04) Josephine Linden 05) John T. McClain 06) Maureen Mullen Murphy 07) Jignesh Patel 08) Jonah Staw
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3.
2. Advisory vote to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers.
3. Ratify the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2022.
NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
For Against Abstain
0000550504_1 R1.0.0.24
Yes No
Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) DateCONTENTS


LOGO

LANDS’ END, INC.
ADMISSION TICKET
You should present this admission ticket in order to gain admittance to the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. This ticket admits only the stockholder(s) listed on the reverse side and is not transferable. If shares are held in the name of a broker, trust, bank, or other nominee, you should bring with you a statement, proxy or letter from the broker, trustee, bank or nominee confirming the beneficial ownership of the shares as of the record date. Use of cameras, recording devices and other electronics will not be permitted at the meeting.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at www.proxyvote.com
Lands’ End, Inc.
This Proxy is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors of Lands’ End, Inc.
May 11, 2022
The undersigned, revoking any proxy previously given, hereby appoint(s) James Gooch, Peter L. Gray and Bernard L. McCracken, all of whom are officers of Lands’ End, Inc., and each of them, as proxies with full powers of substitution, to vote, as directed on the reverse side of this card, all shares the undersigned is entitled to vote at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Lands’ End, Inc. to be held on May 11, 2022 at 2:00 p.m. Central Time, and at any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting, and authorize(s) each proxy to vote at their discretion on any other matter that may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or at any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION TO VOTE ON THE ELECTIONTABLE OF SUCH SUBSTITUTE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR AS SUCH PROXIES MAY SELECT IN THE EVENT THAT ANY NOMINEE(S) NAMED ON THIS PROXY CARD BECOME(S) UNABLE TO SERVE AS A DIRECTOR.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein and in the discretion of the proxy holders on all other matters properly coming before the Annual Meeting. If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR all of the Board of Directors’ nominees for election to the Board of Directors, FOR proposal 2, and FOR proposal 3.
SEE REVERSE SIDE
0000550504_2 R1.0.0.24CONTENTS


0000799288 3 2023-01-28 2024-02-02